PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3287906

Corporate influence on threshold limit values.

B I Castleman·G E Ziem
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Investigations into the historical development of specific Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) for many substances have revealed serious shortcomings in the process followed by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Unpublished corporate communications were important in developing TLVs for 104 substances; for 15 of these, the TLV documentation was based solely on such information. Efforts to obtain written copies of this unpublished material were mostly unsuccessful. Case studies on the TLV Committee's handling of lead and seven carcinogens illustrate various aspects of corporate influence and interaction with the committee. Corporate representatives listed officially as "consultants" since 1970 were given primary responsibility for developing TLVs on proprietary chemicals of the companies that employed them (Dow, DuPont). It is concluded that an ongoing international effort is needed to develop scientifically based guidelines to replace the TLVs in a climate of openness and without manipulation by vested interests.

Explore related subjects

AcrylonitrileArsenicAsbestosAziridinesBenzeneCarcinogensDocumentationEnvironmental ExposureHistory, 20th CenturyHumansIndustryInternational CooperationLeadMaximum Allowable ConcentrationMutagensOccupational DiseasesSulfuric Acid EstersVinyl ChlorideHistorical ArticleJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B I Castleman, G E Ziem. 1988. Corporate influence on threshold limit values.. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700130503

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Evaluation of temperature effects on selectivity in RPLC separations using polybutadiene-coated zirconia.

The effect of temperature on selectivity in RPLC method development has been evaluated on polybutadiene-coated zirconia. We find that the influence of temperature on selectivity depends strongly on solute type. For solutes of similar structure such as polyaromatic hydrocarbons, temperature has almost no effect on selectivity; however, for solutes with very different functional groups such as chlorophenols, temperature changes did significantly affect selectivity. We feel that simple mixtures with one dominant retention mechanism-e.g., solvophobic retention-will not be helped appreciably by adjusting temperature. However, in complex mixtures with polar and ionizable solutes, optimization by varying the temperature may well be fruitful.

Acrylonitrile↗
PubMed1997

Biological markers of acute acrylonitrile intoxication in rats as a function of dose and time.

Three markers of acute acrylonitrile (AN) intoxication, namely, tissue glutathione (GSH), tissue cyanide (CN), and covalent binding to tissue protein, were studied as a function of dose and time. Doses administered and responses expected were 20 mg/kg (LD0), 50 mg/kg (LD10), 80 mg/kg (LD50), and 115 mg/kg (LD90). Liver GSH was the most sensitive marker of AN exposure. At 80 mg/kg AN, virtually complete depletion of liver GSH was observed within 30 min with no recovery through 120 min. Kidney GSH showed a similar, but less intense depletion; while blood and brain GSH were more refractory to AN. Whole blood and brain CN rose progressively during the first 60 min in a dose-dependent fashion. At the lowest dose, CN levels decreased thereafter, whereas, at the three higher doses, CN levels were maintained or continued to increase through 120 min. At the highest dose, blood and brain CN remained at acutely toxic levels through 240 min. Covalent binding increased rapidly in all tissues during the first 30 min at all doses. At the lowest dose, little additional covalent binding was observed beyond 30 min, while at the three higher doses, covalent binding increased, although at a slower rate. The data indicate that these three biologic markers of acute AN intoxication respond dramatically in a time-dependent manner in the toxic dosage range. Furthermore, the data provide evidence that AN toxicity is gated by GSH depletion in liver with the resultant termination of AN detoxification.

Acrylonitrile↗
PubMed1997

Dose dependence of covalent binding of acrylonitrile to tissue protein and globin in rats.

The dose dependence of acrylonitrile (AN) covalent binding to tissue protein, following a single acute exposure over a 100-fold range in dose, was measured. Covalent binding was a linear function of AN dose in the lower dose range (0.02-0.95 mmol AN/kg). The slopes of the dose-response curves indicated that tissues varied by nearly 10-fold in their reactivity with AN. The relative order of covalent binding was as follows: blood > > kidney = liver > forestomach = brain > glandular stomach > > muscle. Similar dose-response behavior was observed for globin total covalent binding and for globin N-(2-cyanoethyl) valine (CEValine) adduct formation. The latter adduct was found to represent only 0.2% of the total AN adduction to globin. Regression of tissue protein binding versus globin total covalent binding or globin CEValine adduct indicated that both globin biomarkers could be used as surrogates to estimate the amount of AN bound to tissue protein. At higher AN doses, above approximately 1 mmol/kg, a sharp break in the covalent binding dose-response curve was observed. This knot value is explained by the nearly complete depletion of liver glutathione and the resultant termination of AN detoxification. The toxicity of AN is known to increase sharply above this dose. The data suggest that a comparison of specific tissue proteins labeled by AN above and below this threshold dose may provide some insight into the mechanism of AN-induced toxicity.

Acrylonitrile↗