Cross-modality consistencies in individual differences in self-attribution.

J Duncan; J D Laird

doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00146.x

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 328850

Cross-modality consistencies in individual differences in self-attribution.

J Duncan·J D Laird

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Cognitive Dissonance Emotions Facial Expression Female Humans Individuality Internal-External Control Male Motivation Projective Techniques Self Concept Self-Assessment Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

J Duncan, J D Laird. 1977. Cross-modality consistencies in individual differences in self-attribution.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00146.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2005

What we regret most... and why.

Which domains in life produce the greatest potential for regret, and what features of those life domains explain why? Using archival and laboratory evidence, the authors show that greater perceived opportunity within life domains evokes more intense regret. This pattern is consistent with previous publications demonstrating greater regret stemming from high rather than low opportunity or choice. A meta-analysis of 11 regret ranking studies revealed that the top six biggest regrets in life center on (in descending order) education, career, romance, parenting, the self, and leisure. Study Set 2 provided new laboratory evidence that directly linked the regret ranking to perceived opportunity. Study Set 3 ruled out an alternative interpretation involving framing effects. Overall, these findings show that people's biggest regrets are a reflection of where in life they see their largest opportunities; that is, where they see tangible prospects for change, growth, and renewal.

Cognitive Dissonance↗

PubMed2005

Money for consent--psychological consideration.

CONTEXT: Regarding the increasing gap between demand and supply of donor organs the question is increasingly discussed, if families of organ donors should receive a financial incentive for consenting to organ donation. However, little attention has been paid to the psychological consequences of such incentives. OBJECTIVE: We discuss the question of financial incentives for families of presumed organ donors in the light of relevant psychological theories. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Overview of the psychological literature. Only well established theories were included. CONCLUSIONS: We summarise, that financial benefits for consent to organ donoation could affect adversely the public opinion toward organ donation and the whole process of transplantation and thus could counterproductively influence the consent rates.

Cognitive Dissonance↗

PubMed2004

Motivational interviewing in health settings: a review.

There is evidence that patient-centred approaches to health care consultations may have better outcomes than traditional advice giving, especially when lifestyle change is involved. Motivational interviewing (MI) is a patient-centred approach that is gathering increased interest in health settings. It provides a way of working with patients who may not seem ready to make the behaviour changes that are considered necessary by the health practitioner. The current paper provides an overview of MI, with particular reference to its application to health problems.

Cognitive Dissonance↗