PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3298586

Denture stomatitis: a review.

Abstract

Denture stomatitis has been reported in 11-67% of complete denture wearers. It is more common on the palatal mucosa and in female patients. In Newton's type I denture stomatitis, where the inflammation remains focal, trauma seems to be responsible. In Newton's types II and III denture stomatitis, where the denture-bearing mucosa is diffusely involved, most workers assert that the aetiology is multi-factorial. Evidence is presented incriminating Candida albicans colonization of the fitting surface of the prosthesis in many cases of denture stomatitis promoted by continuous denture wearing. Allergic and primary irritant reactions to the denture base material, systemic predisposing factors including dietary deficiency and haematological disorders, also play a part. In most cases of denture stomatitis, elimination of denture faults, control of denture plaque and discontinuous denture wearing are sufficient treatment. The routine use of antiseptic or antimycotic drugs seems unnecessary.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T M Arendorf, D M Walker. 1987. Denture stomatitis: a review.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1987.tb00713.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A study to compare the oral health impact profile and satisfaction before and after having replacement complete dentures in England and Scotland.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the oral health impact profile (OHIP) on edentulous subjects in Scotland and England who needed to have their dentures replaced, and to determine whether any change in the subjects' assessment of their original and replacement dentures impacted on oral health related quality of life parameters. BACKGROUND: The loss of all teeth may impact on functional activities. The OHIP is an instrument used to measure subjects' perception of the social impact of oral disorders on their well being. METHODS: A total of 58 edentulous subjects were studied. Subjects completed the OHIP-14 questionnaires before and after being provided with a set of replacement complete dentures. They also assessed specific features of the upper and lower dentures. Responses were recorded on a Likert scale. RESULTS: For many subjects, the responses in the before treatment questionnaires were at the lower end of the Likert scale, indicating that there were no major impacts on oral health related quality of life parameters. There were significant improvements in four of the 14 OHIP parameters assessed after treatment. With the new dentures, subjects expressed improved satisfaction, particularly for the lower prosthesis. There were no major differences between the responses of the subjects in Scotland and England. CONCLUSION: For this group of edentulous subjects, although they may need dentures to be replaced after a period of wear, this does not necessarily have significant social impacts. For this reason the provision of new dentures did not result in major changes to the OHIP.

Denture, Complete↗

House mental classification system of denture patients: the contribution of Milus M House.

Although Dr Milus M. House is credited with devising a method to describe the mental classification of complete denture patients, a review of the literature raises questions regarding the origin of the system. Dr Ewell Neil should have received credit for developing the classification system attributed to Dr House. The contribution of Dr House appears to be a detailed expansion of the classification and the subsequent popularization of the system.

Denture, Complete↗