PubMed · 3348455
Ostensible agency: another malpractice hazard.
Abstract
Under the tort doctrine of ostensible (apparent) agency, a psychiatrist was named as a codefendant in a psychiatric malpractice suit against a nonmedical psychotherapist employed in his medical group, who had treated the plaintiff in her private practice in the same offices. The psychiatrist was later dismissed as a defendant, but to avoid being sued in such a case, a psychiatrist contemplating an association with another professional should 1) check the professional's record with the appropriate licensing agency, 2) require proof of licensure and malpractice insurance, 3) require that the professional's private patients sign disclosure statements, and 4) assure that names on written materials are kept separate.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
G J Firman. 1988. Ostensible agency: another malpractice hazard.. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.145.4.510
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.