PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3362736

Clinical indicators for lumbar puncture.

N M Rosenberg·T Bobowski
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This study was conducted to demonstrate that experienced pediatricians using standard clinical indications for performing a lumbar puncture should have a higher yield of positive spinal taps than previously reported and also can detect bacterial meningitis. These indicators included temperature elevation, inability to be consoled, level of alertness, nuchal rigidity, bulging fontanel, decreased appetite, rash, referral, and febrile seizures. Eighty-two of 381 (22%) lumbar punctures were positive for pleocytosis and/or organisms. Patients were divided into two groups, consisting of those with one indicator (low risk) and those with greater than one indicator (high risk). Thirteen of 14 patients with bacterial meningitis were placed in the high risk group. The single patient in the low risk group had been pretreated with antibiotics. The positive predictive value in bacterial meningitis for a score greater than one was 5%. The average number of clinical indicators in bacterial meningitis was 3.7, versus 2.4 in viral meningitis and 1.6 without meningitis. These findings suggest that, in the absence of prior antibiotic therapy, an experienced pediatrician can clinically detect patients at high risk for bacterial meningitis. Nonbacterial meningitis cannot be as readily detected clinically.

Explore related subjects

Gram-Positive BacteriaHumansInfantLeukocyte CountMeningitisProspective StudiesSeasonsSpinal PunctureJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N M Rosenberg, T Bobowski. 1988. Clinical indicators for lumbar puncture.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006565-198803000-00002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Identification of a Nonribosomal Peptide Analog With Activity Against Multiple Gram-Positive Bacteria via a Synthetic Bioinformatic Natural Product Discovery Approach.

Nonribosomal peptide (NRP) antibiotics exhibit potent biological activities and are broadly used in clinical therapy. Because most microorganisms are difficult to culture and many antibiotic biosynthetic genes are silent, traditional activity tracking approaches face major limitations in the discovery of novel NRPs. Here, based on a synthetic bioinformatic natural product (syn-BNP) discovery approach that integrates bioinformatics and chemical synthesis, a novel nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) gene cluster from the genome of Rhodococcus erythropolis D-1 was mined. A putative NRP scaffold synthesized by the NRPS encoded by this cluster was predicted. Through chemical synthesis and four rounds of structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies, 37 NRP analogs were ultimately generated. Among these analogs, ZURJC28 shows activity against multiple Gram-positive bacteria, including two drug-resistant strains. Mechanistic studies and metabolomics analyses revealed that ZURJC28 exerts membrane-disruptive activity associated with interaction with phosphatidylglycerol (PG)-enriched Gram-positive membranes, leading to membrane damage and widespread metabolic dysregulation. ZURJC28 also shows low cytotoxicity and low hemolytic activity, suggesting its preliminary in vitro safety profile.

Gram-Positive Bacteria↗
PubMed2006

Human Langerhans cells express a specific TLR profile and differentially respond to viruses and Gram-positive bacteria.

Dendritic cells (DC) are APCs essential for the development of primary immune responses. In pluristratified epithelia, Langerhans cells (LC) are a critical subset of DC which take up Ags and migrate toward lymph nodes upon inflammatory stimuli. TLR allow detection of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP) by different DC subsets. The repertoire of TLR expressed by human LC is uncharacterized and their ability to directly respond to PAMP has not been systematically investigated. In this study, we show for the first time that freshly purified LC from human skin express mRNA encoding TLR1, TLR2, TLR3, TLR5, TLR6 and TLR10. In addition, keratinocytes ex vivo display TLR1-5, TLR7, and TLR10. Accordingly, highly enriched immature LC efficiently respond to TLR2 agonists peptidoglycan and lipoteichoic acid from Gram-positive bacteria, and to dsRNA which engages TLR3. In contrast, LC do not directly sense TLR7/8 ligands and LPS from Gram-negative bacteria, which signals through TLR4. TLR engagement also results in cytokine production, with marked differences depending on the PAMP detected. TLR2 and TLR3 ligands increase IL-6 and IL-8 production, while dsRNA alone stimulates TNF-alpha release. Strikingly, only peptidoglycan triggers IL-10 secretion, thereby suggesting a specific function in tolerance to commensal Gram-positive bacteria. However, LC do not produce IL-12p70 or type I IFNs. In conclusion, human LC are equipped with TLR that enable direct detection of PAMP from viruses and Gram-positive bacteria, subsequent phenotypic maturation, and differential cytokine production. This implies a significant role for LC in the control of skin immune responses.

Gram-Positive Bacteria↗
PubMed2002

A positive donor gram stain does not predict outcome following lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Many potential lung donors are excluded on the basis of a positive donor gram stain (DGS). We examined the association between a positive DGS and the probability of post-operative recipient pneumonia in the first 30 days. METHODS: Ninety lung transplants (80 with a non-septic pre-transplant diagnosis) from 60 consecutive donors were evaluated for post-operative pneumonia (defined as a compatible clinical syndrome with fever, leukocytosis, chest X-ray abnormalities or histologic evidence obtained by transbronchial biopsy). DGS, white blood cell quantity, CXR and PaO(2)/FIO(2) (P/F) ratio were compared with immediate and 24-hour P/F ratio, length of mechanical ventilation and incidence of pneumonia. All recipients received standard prophylactic anti-bacterial coverage. Patients not surviving 30 days (n = 3) were excluded from this study, but none had evidence of pneumonia either by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), transbronchial biopsy or autopsy. RESULTS: Fourteen (16%) of our 87 recipients developed pneumonia in the first 30 days after transplant. Of the 43 patients with a positive DGS, 5 (12%) developed pneumonia, compared to 9 of 44 (20%) with a negative DGS (p = 0.26). The mean post-operative P/F ratio (315 +/- 47 with a positive DGS, p = 0.3) and length of mechanical ventilation (2 days in each group) did not differ significantly between the negative and positive DGS groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the current era of lung transplantation, DGS does not predict the development of early post-operative pneumonia and does not affect oxygenation or duration of mechanical ventilation; therefore, its role should be diminished when judging donor lung suitability.

Gram-Positive Bacteria↗