PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3385676

Why research doesn't yield treatment.

Abstract

This article has presented examples from nursing research with chronically mentally ill clients that illustrate problems with utilization of nursing research in this field. Obstacles to utilizing research in clinical practice include (a) difficulty in identification of treatment goals; (b) difficulty in measurement of treatment outcomes; (c) diversity of psychotherapeutic interventions; (d) attrition of clients over a relatively short period of time; and (e) variation among clients with regard to degree of impairment, response to medication, and social support. These problems were examined using the criteria described by Fawcett (1982) for utilization of research findings: scientific merit, clinical relevance, and clinical evaluation. Limitations for utilizing findings from research with the chronically mentally ill were illustrated in the areas of scientific merit and clinical evaluation. However, studies of the chronically mentally ill and their treatment showed definite clinical relevance, indicating the need for further research with the chronically mentally ill.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Baier. 1988. Why research doesn't yield treatment.. https://doi.org/10.3928/0279-3695-19880501-09

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Iron regulation.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chronic Disease↗

The long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training on the work participation of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic low back pain is influenced by multiple factors. Multidisciplinary back training represents one of the options to take this multiplicity into account. So far, only evidence of the short-term effectiveness of this approach in terms of work participation is available. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and the references of various articles were screened for relevant publications. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were evaluated for their methodologic quality. RESULTS: Five of the studies had a low methodologic quality. All high-quality studies found a positive effect on at least one of the 4 outcome measures used. Based on our criteria, effectiveness was found for the outcome measures of work participation and quality of life. No effectiveness was found for experienced pain and functional status. The intensity of the intervention seems to have no substantial influence on the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSION: In the long-term, multidisciplinary back training has a positive effect on work participation in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Chronic Disease↗