PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3397237

Inter-stimulus interval in audiometry for neonates.

Abstract

The usual paradigm employed for both clinical and experimental evaluation of auditory responsiveness of newborns dictates that signal presentations be separated by a minimum of 15 s. Furthermore, this paradigm requires that there be 8 presentations of the signal and that two responses among the 8 trials should be taken as normal responsiveness. Many have been concerned about accepting 25% as normal, and would prefer a paradigm that could lead to increased responsiveness. A procedure with inter-stimulus intervals longer than 15 s might be that paradigm. Therefore, the following experiment employed inter-stimulus intervals of 15, 30 and 60 s to examine responsiveness of infants young enough to be in a newborn nursery. Each infant received 24 signal presentations (8 with each of the 3 inter-stimulus intervals), and these were counter-balanced across babies. Although there is evidence of response habituation across time, there is also evidence that longer inter-stimulus intervals do lead to increased responsiveness.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S E Gerber, T K Davis, K M Mastrini. 1988. Inter-stimulus interval in audiometry for neonates.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-5876(88)90069-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

REM sleep enhancement due to rhythmical auditory stimulation in the rat.

From a physiological viewpoint, REM sleep (REMS) is a period during which homeostatic physiological regulations are impaired. In the rat, REMS occurs in two forms respectively characterized by episodes separated by long intervals (single REMS episodes) and by episodes which have short intervals and occur in sequences (REMS clusters). Since the partition of REMS in the form of either single or clustered episodes may reveal how the REMS drive and body homeostatic processes interact in the control of REMS occurrence, we have used this approach to clarify the effects of the rhythmical delivery of an auditory stimulus (1000 Hz, 63 or 88 dB, 50 ms, every 20 s), which has been previously observed by different authors to enhance REMS in the absence of a previous sleep deprivation. Stimuli were delivered to pairs of animals and triggered by the occurrence of REMS in one rat (REMS-selective stimulation), whilst the other animal received the same stimulus irrespectively of the stage of the wake-sleep cycle (REMS-unselective stimulation). The results showed that the REMS-selective stimulation did not change the overall amount of REMS, since an increase in the occurrence of REMS clusters was concomitant with a decrease in the occurrence of single REMS episodes. In contrast, under the REMS-unselective stimulation, the total amount of REMS was increased during the second day of stimulation through an increase in the duration of both types of REMS episodes. Since during the REMS-unselective stimulation 87% of the stimuli fell outside REMS (i.e., during the REMS interval), the results show that the occurrence of REMS is more consistently affected when the stimuli are delivered in a period during which homeostatic physiological regulations are fully operant.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Footshock-induced sensitization of the acoustic startle response in two strains of mice.

It has been shown before that unconditioned footshocks can augment the acoustic startle response in rats. In the present study, male mice of two strains, C57Bl/6N and BALB/c, were compared with regard to footshock-induced sensitization of the acoustic startle response. Presentation of footshocks did not affect the acoustic startle response in C57Bl/6N mice, while in contrast, footshock-induced sensitization was apparent in the BALB/c strain. Shocked C57Bl/6N mice, but not BALB/c mice, displayed robust conditioning to the startle context when re-tested the next day. These findings indicate that mice may exhibit footshock-induced sensitization of the acoustic startle response, but that the effects of footshocks on the acoustic startle are strain- and time-dependent.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Oscillation may play a role in time domain central auditory processing.

To study how sound intensity altered the temporal response pattern of a unit, we recorded from 92 single neurons in the inferior colliculus (IC) of the little brown bat and investigated their firing patterns in response to brief tone pulses (2 msec duration) at the characteristic frequency of the unit over a wide dynamic range (10-90 dB sound pressure level). We found two unusual response characteristics at high sound levels in approximately one-third of the IC neurons investigated. For 16 IC neurons (17%), an increase in sound level not only elicited a shorter response latency and an increase in spike count but also transformed the firing pattern of the unit from phasic to periodic; this pattern was more pronounced at higher sound levels. The firing periodicity was unit specific, ranging from 1.3 to 6.7 msec. Twenty-seven IC neurons (29%) exhibited a longer response latency at higher sound levels compared with lower sound levels [i.e., paradoxical latency shift (PLS)]. The majority of this population showed a one or more quantum increase in latency when sound level was elevated. The quantum shift was also unit specific, ranging from 1.2 to 8.2 msec. We further investigated the firing patterns of 14 IC neurons showing PLS before, during, and after iontophoretic application of bicuculline. For 12 of these neurons, drug application abolished the PLS and transformed the firing patterns of the unit at high sound levels from phasic into sustained periodic discharges. Our results suggest that neural oscillation in combination with ordinary inhibition may be responsible for the creation of PLSs shown previously to be important for temporal information processing.

Acoustic Stimulation↗