PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3397611

Computerized Anesthesia Personnel System.

Abstract

CAPS, (Computerized Anesthesia Personnel System), is a personnel management system for a large anesthesia department. It is written in BASIC for the IBM PC or IBM-compatible computer using 2 or more 5 1/4 inch disk drives or a hard disk. CAPS is designed to facilitate assignment of up to 30 attending anesthesiologists, 40 residents, 15 CRNAs, 5 interns, 5 anesthesia assistants, and up to 15 medical students to the operating room schedule. The system supports part-time personnel, regular laboratory/office/reading days, and resident rotations inside the operating suite, outside the operating suite, and to secondary hospitals. CAPS generates an availability list each day, listing all persons available for the operating room and the rotations and call days assigned. It then lists all persons not available that day and the reason for the absence. CAPS also tracts vacation, meeting, administrative and compensatory time for all members of the department, and maintains an absence record for each person listing sick times and all other absences. CAPS generates a weekly staffing list showing days each person is available to the operating room and the total number of attendings, residents, CRNAs, and assistants available each day. This article discusses why the program was developed, how it was designed, and how well it has met the objectives of the designers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H S Holley, F Heller. 1988. Computerized Anesthesia Personnel System.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02919651

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

How can a standard software package for data management in anesthesia be achieved?

Collecting data for administrative, statistical, medical, and organizational purposes is becoming increasingly important in anesthesia. In 1986 the Swiss Society for Anesthesiology decided to create a program that would be compatible for different computers and would expedite data collection. The system developed was called Information System for Operations (ISOP), which was written in the database and programming system Massachusetts General Hospital Utility Multi Programming System (MUMPS). It was installed in eight hospitals and met the initial requirements, but the individual requirements of the hospitals were greatly underestimated. MUMPS has an impressive data storage capability and handling when used in a personal computer (PC) network. The user-interface, however, is inferior to other PC packages, partly because windowing and mouse support were not implemented when the ANSI standard was set. Improved statistical programs, a module for on-line data acquisition, and intensive care unit (ICU) use will be additional modules to the program.

Anesthesia Department, Hospital

Can a clinician predict the technical equipment a patient will need during intensive care unit treatment? An approach to standardize and redesign the intensive care unit workstation.

The technical equipment of today's intensive care unit (ICU) workstation has been characterized by a gradual, incremental accumulation of individual devices, whose presence is dictated by patient needs. These devices usually present differently designed controls, operate under different alarm philosophies, and cannot communicate with each other. By contrast, ICU workstations could be equipped permanently and in a standardized manner with electronically linked modules if the attending physicians could reliably predict, at the time of admission, the patient's equipment needs. Over a period of 3 1/2 months, the doctors working in our 20-bed surgical ICU made 1,000 predictions concerning outcome, equipment need, duration of artificial ventilation, and duration of hospitalization for 300 recently admitted patients. The interviews were made within the first 24 hours after admission. The doctors being interviewed were usually (i.e., in over 90% of cases) unfamiliar with the patient. Information concerning the patient's general state of health, special pre-ICU events, and complications was offered to the interviewed clinician because this information represents standard admission data. It was found that the equipment need (represented by two different setups, "high tech" and "low tech") could be predicted most reliably (96.4% correct predictions) compared with a prediction on outcome of ICU treatment (94.5%), on duration of artificial ventilation (75.4%), and on duration of stay (43.4%). There was no significant (p greater than 0.05) difference in the reliability of predictions between residents and consultants. Factors influencing the postoperative equipment need varied with surgical specialty.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anesthesia Department, Hospital