PubMed · 3503623
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
V Pietropaolo, L Masoni, M Ferrara, G Bogliolo. 1987. [Electronic video-endoscopy].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3503623/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to examine the effect of the angle between optical axis of the endoscope and the instruments' plane (OAIP) on the monitor display angle (approach angle between the two instruments on a two-dimensional monitor) and endoscopic task performance. METHODS: Two experiments were carried out in the Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester (ADEPT) using a standard two-dimensional video endoscopic system. In the first experiment, the monitor display angle was measured during use, with OAIP angles ranging between 0 and 80 degrees (at 10 degrees increments) and manipulation angles varying between 45 and 120 degrees (at 15 degrees increments). In the second experiment, 10 surgeons tied 500 intracorporeal knots with OAIP angles of 0 degrees (optical axis in the same plane as the instruments), +15 degrees and +30 degrees (viewing above the instruments' plane), and -15 and -30 degrees (optical axis looking from below instruments' plane). The end points were the execution time and knot quality score (KQS). RESULTS: In the first experiment, instruments entered the visual field from lateral sides of the monitor with an apparent 180 degrees monitor display angle with a 0 degrees OAIP angle, whereas the monitor display angle approached the actual manipulation angle between the two needle drivers when an 80 degrees OAIP angle was used. In the second experiment, the instruments appeared to enter the image field from the side of the surgeon when the endoscope viewed the instruments from above, whereas instruments entered the field from the opposite side to the surgeon when the endoscope viewed instruments' plane from below. As a result, use of 0 and +15 degrees OATP angles yielded significantly shorter execution times: 70 s compared to 83, 93, and 77 s for +30, -30, and -15 degrees OAIP angles ( p < 0.001), with KQS of 39 degrees and 40 vs 38, 36, and 34%, respectively ( p = 0.257). CONCLUSIONS: The angle between the optical axis of the endoscope and instruments' plane determines how the instruments appear to enter the operative field. The monitor display angle between the instruments is different from the real manipulation angle unless the OAIP angle is near 80 degrees. The apparent entry of instruments into the operative field becomes intuitive for the surgeon only if the endoscope is viewing from above or in the same plane as the instruments. Hence, the best performance for endoscopic knot tying is obtained with this configuration, and execution time increases significantly with viewing from below the instruments' plane.
A miniaturized sensor head for endoscopic measurements based on digital holography is described. The system was developed to measure the shape and the three-dimensional deformation of objects located at places to which there is no access by common measurement systems. A miniaturized optical sensor, including a complete digital holographic interferometer with a CCD camera, is placed at the end of a flexible endoscope. The diameter of the head is smaller than 10 mm. The system enables interferometric measurements to be made at speeds of as many as five reconstructions per second, and it can be used outside the laboratory under normal environmental conditions. Shape measurements are performed with two wavelengths for contouring, and the deformation is measured by digital holographic interferometry. To obtain full three-dimensional data in displacement measurements we illuminate the object sequentially from three different illumination directions. To increase the lateral resolution we use temporal phase shifting.