PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3531911

Further experience utilizing the Gildenberg technique for computed tomography-guided stereotactic biopsies.

Abstract

Initial experience using the Gildenberg technique for computed tomography-guided stereotactic biopsies is reviewed. Of 50 patients, adequate tissue was obtained in 49. In one patient, the stereotactic frame was unable to reach the selected biopsy site. In 32 of 49 patients, the diagnosis was obtained with one biopsy; in the remainder, two to five samples were required. In 4 cases, a subsequent craniotomy was performed; these provided similar histopathological tissue and in no case was the diagnosis altered. The lesions were categorized by CT as ring-enhancing lesions (REL), enhancing lesions with surrounding low density (ELLD), and low density lesions with and without peripheral areas of enhancement. Of the REL, 21 of 23 were primary tumors. Of the ELLD, 5 of 13 were primary tumors; the remainder had a wide spectrum of disease. Of the low density lesions without enhancement, 6 were primary tumors and 1 was an inflammatory process. Three patients had low density lesions with peripheral areas of enhancement and proved to have malignant primary tumors. The remaining patients had multiple lesions with both primary and metastatic disease. Twelve RELs were biopsied in multiple sites. An accurate diagnosis was best obtained by performing the first biopsy in the enhancing rim with additional biopsies as needed in the low density center. Homogeneous lesions could be biospied with target selection based upon a primary regard for safety rather than imaging characteristics. Three patients had transiently increased hemiparesis and one had a transient decrease in level of consciousness after biopsy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D E Bullard, D Osborne, P C Burger, B S Nashold. 1986. Further experience utilizing the Gildenberg technique for computed tomography-guided stereotactic biopsies.. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198609000-00009

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

BACKGROUND: In fair-skinned Caucasian populations both the incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma have been increasing over the past decades. With adjuvant therapies still being under investigation, early detection is the only way to improve melanoma patient survival. The influence of incisional biopsies on melanoma patient survival has been discussed for many years. This study investigates both the influence of diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of residual tumor cells in the re-excision specimen on disease free and overall survival. METHODS: After (partial) removal of a pigmented skin lesion 471 patients were diagnosed with stage I/II melanoma and underwent re-excision and a sentinel node biopsy. All patients were followed prospectively, mean follow up >5 years. Patients were divided according to their diagnostic biopsy type (wide excision biopsy, narrow excision biopsy, excision biopsy with positive margins and incisional biopsy) and the presence of residual tumor cells in their re-excision specimen. Survival analysis was done using Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for eight important confounders of melanoma patient survival. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy was wide in 279 patients, narrow in 109 patients, 52 patients underwent an excision biopsy with positive margins and 31 patients an incisional biopsy. In 41 patients residual tumor cells were present in the re-excision specimen. Both the diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of tumor cells in the re-excision specimen did not influence disease free and overall survival of melanoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Biopsy↗