Alternative approaches to external chest compression.

Abstract

The finding that blood flow during external chest compression may be due to increased intrathoracic pressure, and the subsequent reporting of increased carotid blood flow with simultaneous ventilation and chest compression or with abdominal binding during CPR ignited a flurry of investigations into alternative approaches to CPR. A number of alterations of the conventional CPR technique were proposed, many resulting in improved hemodynamics when compared with standard CPR techniques in the same subject. However, some of the proposed methods increased cerebral blood flow but decreased myocardial perfusion. Others improved systolic pressures but decreased vital organ blood flow. More importantly, most studies with survival as an end point failed to show a benefit when alternative approaches to CPR were used. Therefore, it is unlikely that there will be significant changes in the recommendations for the use of adjuncts during CPR. Not all studies support the conclusion that blood flow during closed-chest compression is secondary to increased intrathoracic pressure. It is probable that in man there is a spectrum. In some individuals the predominant mechanism of blood flow during CPR may be cardiac and/or vascular compression, and in others flow may be secondary to an increased intrathoracic pressure.