PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3538862

Work measurement in pharmacy research.

Abstract

The applicability of various methods of work measurement to pharmacy research is discussed, and studies that have used these methods are reviewed. Methods of work measurement include subjective evaluation, direct time study, work sampling, statistical data, and pre-determined data. Subjective evaluation lacks precision in its estimates but may be useful in formulating hypotheses. Direct time study is most appropriate for readily observable, highly repetitive tasks that can be divided into short segments, although it has been used for longer and more variable activities. Work sampling is the most frequent method of work measurement used in pharmacy research, but few studies reported doing any check of measurement reliability or validity. Multidimensional work sampling and other forms of direct-entry, self-reporting work sampling may be useful in measuring the more complex and unobservable tasks of pharmacists such as clinical activities. By developing an understanding of the purposes and applications of measurement techniques, hospital pharmacists can choose the most appropriate method for their research setting and purpose.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K L Rascati, C L Kimberlin, W C McCormick. 1986. Work measurement in pharmacy research.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3538862/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clinical pharmacokinetic data of racemic drugs obtained by the indirect method following precolumn diastereomer formation: is the influence of racemization during chiral derivatization significant?

This report reviews the stereoselective data of a number of racemic drugs (n = 17) obtained from indirect chiral method (via diastereomer formation) in comparison to similar data generated by the application of a direct chiral method. While it was noted that the indirect method still continued to be used to characterize the stereoselective disposition of racemic drugs, the present review critically evaluates the issue of racemization that has the potential to skew the stereoselective data obtained from the indirect method. The review describes various remedies to counter and/or minimize the impact of racemization on the final outcome of the stereoselective analysis by the indirect method. On the basis of this review it could be concluded that the indirect method is a viable and important tool for gathering stereoselective data of racemic drugs used in medical practice as well for those racemic drugs still in discovery and developmental stages.

Methods↗