PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3576014

What do doctors know about statistics?

H R Wulff·B Andersen·P Brandenhoff·F Guttler
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A multiple choice test with nine statistical questions was sent to a random sample of Danish doctors to assess their knowledge of elementary statistical expressions (SD, SE, p less than 0.05, p greater than 0.05 and r). One hundred and forty eight (59 per cent) of 250 doctors answered the questions. The test was also completed by 97 participants in postgraduate courses in research methods, mainly junior hospital doctors. The median number of correct answers was 2.4 in the random sample and 4.0 in the other sample of doctors. It is concluded that the statistical knowledge of most doctors is so limited that they cannot be expected to draw the right conclusions from those statistical analyses which are found in papers in medical journals. Sixty-five per cent of the doctors in the random sample stated that it is very important that this problem is raised.

Explore related subjects

BiometryDenmarkEducation, MedicalPhysiciansJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H R Wulff, B Andersen, P Brandenhoff, F Guttler. What do doctors know about statistics?. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780060103

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Coloured noise or low-dimensional chaos?

Devising a method capable of distinguishing a low-dimensional chaotic signal that might be embedded in a noisy stochastic process has become a major challenge for those involved in time-series analysis. Here a null hypothesis approach is used in conjunction with a known nonlinear predictive test, to probe for the presence of chaos in epidemiological data. A probabilistic set of rules is used to stimulate a historic record of New York City measles outbreaks, generally understood to be governed by a chaotic attractor. The simulated runs of 'surrogate data' are carefully constructed so as to be free from any underlying low-dimensional chaotic process. They therefore serve as a useful null model against which to test the observed time series. However, despite the assumed differences between the dynamics of measles outbreaks and the null model, a nonlinear predictive scheme is found to be unable to differentiate between their characteristic time series. The methodology confirms that, if there is in fact a chaotic signal in the measles data, it is extremely difficult to detect in time series of such limited length. The results have general relevance to the analysis of physical, ecological and environmental time series.

Biometry↗