PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3576954

Performance management: an essential program for poison centers.

Abstract

Medico-legal liability and cost effectiveness mandate that poison information specialist performance be optimal. To maximize performance we developed and implemented a performance management program to achieve the objectives of high quality assurance in a cost-effective environment. The program can objectively assess, monitor, develop, discipline and financially compensate poison center staff. The performance standards, jointly developed by the staff and management, are the cornerstone of the program. They serve as a means of measuring and quantifying poison information specialist performance based upon compliance with responsibilities outlined in the standards. Our program enables the poison information specialist to optimize performance and also be cognizant of suboptimal work. Each staff person works with management to develop personal goals, objectives, and a plan for professional growth. Performance standards facilitate good management by improving communication, providing objective feedback, making orientation consistent, and providing an objective basis for promotion and compensation. They also provide an objective basis for dismissing unsatisfactory employees when performance is consistently suboptimal. Since personnel salaries account for 80% of a poison center's budget, effective performance management is essential.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B S Dean, M A Guzzardi, E P Krenzelok. 1987. Performance management: an essential program for poison centers.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3576954/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net.

The authors present an empirical review of the literature concerning trait and state goal orientation (GO). Three dimensions of GO were examined: learning, prove performance, and avoid performance along with presumed antecedents and proximal and distal consequences of these dimensions. Antecedent variables included cognitive ability, implicit theory of intelligence, need for achievement, self-esteem, general self-efficacy, and the Big Five personality characteristics. Proximal consequences included state GO, task-specific self-efficacy, self-set goal level, learning strategies, feedback seeking, and state anxiety. Distal consequences included learning, academic performance, task performance, and job performance. Generally speaking, learning GO was positively correlated, avoid performance GO was negatively correlated, and prove performance GO was uncorrelated with these variables. Consistent with theory, state GO tended to have stronger relationships with the distal consequences than did trait GO. Finally, using a meta-correlation matrix, the authors found that trait GO predicted job performance above and beyond cognitive ability and personality. These results demonstrate the value of GO to organizational researchers.

Employee Performance Appraisal↗

Balanced scorecards for performance management.

Nurse administrators who manage nursing case management programs are challenged to demonstrate the improved quality of patient care and financial outcomes to their organization that result from such programs. This article introduces the balanced scorecard and discusses its benefits and practical concerns for adopting the scorecard. The balanced scorecard is a useful performance management tool used to both evaluate and direct case management performance in meeting organizational missions and strategies.

Employee Performance Appraisal↗