PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3589246

Fitting nonlinear models with ARMA errors to biological rhythm data.

Abstract

Many behavioural and physiological processes are periodic with a period of approximately 24 hours. For descriptive purposes, linear regression using a simple sinusoid with a fixed 24 hour period is sometimes an adequate tool for analysing data from such processes. Inference based on regression models under the assumption of independent and identically distributed errors, however, can often mislead seriously. In this paper we present a general class of models for fitting biological rhythms, with use of higher-order harmonic terms of one or more unknown fundamentals and ARMA processes for the errors. We describe the procedures for model specification and estimation and give the theoretical justification for these procedures. Analysis of a series of human core body temperature illustrates the methodology.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J B Greenhouse, R E Kass, R S Tsay. 1987. Fitting nonlinear models with ARMA errors to biological rhythm data.. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780060209

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Coloured noise or low-dimensional chaos?

Devising a method capable of distinguishing a low-dimensional chaotic signal that might be embedded in a noisy stochastic process has become a major challenge for those involved in time-series analysis. Here a null hypothesis approach is used in conjunction with a known nonlinear predictive test, to probe for the presence of chaos in epidemiological data. A probabilistic set of rules is used to stimulate a historic record of New York City measles outbreaks, generally understood to be governed by a chaotic attractor. The simulated runs of 'surrogate data' are carefully constructed so as to be free from any underlying low-dimensional chaotic process. They therefore serve as a useful null model against which to test the observed time series. However, despite the assumed differences between the dynamics of measles outbreaks and the null model, a nonlinear predictive scheme is found to be unable to differentiate between their characteristic time series. The methodology confirms that, if there is in fact a chaotic signal in the measles data, it is extremely difficult to detect in time series of such limited length. The results have general relevance to the analysis of physical, ecological and environmental time series.

Biometry