PubMed · 3590989
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
V F Kravchenko, Iu V Kroviakov. [Device for microinjection of fluids].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3590989/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
We have developed a micropipette system that allows sampling of preset volumes of liquids and injection of preset small amounts of liquids, using thermal expansion of an oil phase in a micropipette, achieved by increasing or decreasing the current applied to heat the shaft of the micropipette. The system has been tested to inject or collect volumes of about 20 nl, but smaller and larger volumes are possible. The amount injected or collected for a given temperature step of the micropipette is largely independent of the physical properties, e.g. of viscosity, into which the sample is injected or from which it is collected. The pipette tip is not measurably heated when heating the shaft for injection or collection, thus avoiding damage of the biological material into which the injection occurs or from which it is sampled.
BACKGROUND: 'Giant vesicles' have diameters of several micrometers and can be observed by light microscopy. Their size may allow manipulation of individual vesicles and direct observation of the progress of a chemical reaction in real time. We set out to test this possibility using enzymatic hydrolysis of vesicle components as a model system. RESULTS: We describe a novel micromanipulation technique that allows us to microinject femtoliter amounts of a reagent solution adjacent to or into giant vesicles with diameters ranging from 10 to 60 microm. The vesicle transformations can be monitored directly in real time by light microscopy and recorded by video analysis. Snake venom phospholipase A2 was added to vesicles composed of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphocholine, and the enzymatic hydrolysis of components of the lipid bilayer was observed over time. A specific effect on the targeted giant vesicle was seen and video recorded, while the neighbouring vesicles remained unaffected. Addition of the enzyme to the outside of a vesicle caused it to burst, whereas injection of the enzyme inside a vesicle resulted in a slow and constant decrease in its size, until it eventually disappeared from the resolution power of the light microscope. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that it is possible to micromanipulate an individual vesicle, and to follow visually the progress of an enzymatic reaction occurring on the vesicle bilayer over time.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.