PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3693007

Tactics vs strategy in practice.

J Antelyes
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This very brief introduction to the concept of tactics and strategy in practitioner/client conversations will, I hope, stimulate veterinarians to interest themselves further in developing these and other communications skills. Clients frustrated by automatic bank tellers, electronic supermarket checkout stations, and similar depersonalizing machines, will place ever-increasing value on their scarcer and scarcer human contacts. The more proficient we are in relating well to other people, the more successful we will be in practice.

Explore related subjects

CommunicationComputersHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsVeterinary MedicineJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Antelyes. 1987-12-15. Tactics vs strategy in practice.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3693007/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗