PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3722597

What is "synchrony suppression"?

Abstract

Synchrony of discharge of auditory neurons to two-tone stimuli and "synchrony suppression" have been analyzed by examining the implications of the definition of vector strength. Synchrony suppression, defined as the reduction in the vector strength for one component when a second is introduced, occurs by definition when partial ("half-wave") rectification occurs in an otherwise linear system. It does so with the usual shifts (on the abscissa) of empirical vector strength curves, disproving any necessity for compressive or other nonlinearities. Synchrony suppression is sometimes defined incompatibly as the shift in dB of a vector strength curve--said to be the magnitude of suppression. That this conception is incorrect is shown by the identification of partial rectification with vector strength reduction and curve shift, but it can be shown to be a logical fallacy as well. The vector strength definition was also applied to the complex waveform obtained at the output of an instantaneous amplitude compressive nonlinearity. The shifts of vector strength growth and decay curves (at their crossover points) necessarily equal those in the linear case for any compressive nonlinearity that compresses equal inputs equally. But such a compressive nonlinearity is not without noticeable effects on vector strengths. If the input levels lie in the range leading to compressed outputs, differences in the relative input levels will be accentuated in the relative output levels in the period histogram. Compression thus contributes to greater differences in the vector strengths, for unequal input levels, than in the linear case. More visible effects on vector strength curves result from waveform distortion, which reduces vector strength saturation and crossover values and causes them to recede at higher input levels.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D D Greenwood. 1986. What is "synchrony suppression"?. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.393194

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Hearing lips and seeing voices: how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception.

Observing a speaker's mouth profoundly influences speech perception. For example, listeners perceive an "illusory" "ta" when the video of a face producing /ka/ is dubbed onto an audio /pa/. Here, we show how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate this illusory percept and audiovisual (AV) speech perception more generally. Specifically, cortical activity during AV speech perception occurs in many of the same areas that are active during speech production. We find that different perceptions of the same syllable and the perception of different syllables are associated with different distributions of activity in frontal motor areas involved in speech production. Activity patterns in these frontal motor areas resulting from the illusory "ta" percept are more similar to the activity patterns evoked by AV(/ta/) than they are to patterns evoked by AV(/pa/) or AV(/ka/). In contrast to the activity in frontal motor areas, stimulus-evoked activity for the illusory "ta" in auditory and somatosensory areas and visual areas initially resembles activity evoked by AV(/pa/) and AV(/ka/), respectively. Ultimately, though, activity in these regions comes to resemble activity evoked by AV(/ta/). Together, these results suggest that AV speech elicits in the listener a motor plan for the production of the phoneme that the speaker might have been attempting to produce, and that feedback in the form of efference copy from the motor system ultimately influences the phonetic interpretation.

Auditory Perception↗

Top-down processes during auditory phoneme categorization in dyslexia: a PET study.

While persistence of subtle phonological deficits in dyslexic adults is well documented, deficit of categorical perception of phonemes has received little attention so far. We studied learning of phoneme categorization during an activation H(2)O(15) PET experiment in 14 dyslexic adults and 16 normal readers with similar age, handedness and performance IQ. Dyslexic subjects exhibited typical, marked impairments in reading and phoneme awareness tasks. During the PET experiment, subjects performed a discrimination task involving sine wave analogues of speech first presented as pairs of electronic sounds and, after debriefing, as syllables /ba/ and /da/. Discrimination performance and brain activation were compared between the acoustic mode and the speech mode of the task which involved physically identical stimuli; signal changes in the speech mode relative to the acoustic mode revealed the neural counterparts of phonological top-down processes that are engaged after debriefing. Although dyslexic subjects showed good abilities to learn discriminating speech sounds, their performance remained lower than those of normal readers on the discrimination task over the whole experiment. Activation observed in the speech mode in normal readers showed a strongly left-lateralized pattern involving the superior temporal, inferior parietal and inferior lateral frontal cortex. Frontal and parietal subparts of these left-sided regions were significantly more activated in the control group than in the dyslexic group. Activations in the right frontal cortex were larger in the dyslexic group than in the control group for both speech and acoustic modes relative to rest. Dyslexic subjects showed an unexpected large deactivation in the medial occipital cortex for the acoustic mode that may reflect increased effortful attention to auditory stimuli.

Auditory Perception↗