PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3733013

Dealing with psychiatry's stigma.

Abstract

The stigma associated with psychiatry is the most critical problem facing the profession, the author contends. He identifies the major sources of stigma as psychiatrists' internal conflicts over treatment ideologies and methods and the hostility between psychiatrists and other physicians that has led to disparagement of psychiatry as a medical specialty. To combat the stigma he recommends that highest priority be given to efforts to unify the profession and to increase psychiatry's participation in organized medicine. He also urges psychiatrists to limit self-revelation and self-exploration in the media, to emphasize the broad range of knowledge and skills that makes them uniquely suited to perform evaluative and triage functions, and to halt the current practices of shunting whole classes of patients off to other disciplines for care and of educating other disciplines in psychiatric techniques.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P J Fink. 1986. Dealing with psychiatry's stigma.. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.37.8.814

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The effectiveness of academic admission interviews: an exploratory meta-analysis.

Admission to health-related professions is very competitive and selecting candidates with the best prospects for success is critical. A variety of measures are used to assess candidates to predict success. The purpose of this research was to assess the effectiveness of using selection interviews for admissions. Meta-analysis was applied to a sample of 20 studies examined in a comprehensive review article on the use of interviews in healthcare academic disciplines. Nineteen of these studies examined the relationship between performance in an interview situation and academic performance, while 10 examined the relationship between performance in an interview situation and clinical performance. A separate meta-analysis was conducted for each category of performance measure. The mean sample-size-effect size for studies examining the predictive power of interviews for academic success was 0.06 (95% confidence intervals 0.03-0.08), indicating a very small effect. The sample of studies was homogeneous using a fixed-effect model. The sample of studies for predicting clinical success had a mean effect size of 0.17 (95% confidence intervals 0.11-0.22), indicating modest positive predictive power. Using a random-effects model, this sample of studies was also homogeneous. Future research should investigate a larger sample of primary studies.

Health Occupations↗