Why resect the neck?

Patellofemoral motion is significant clinically, yet in the literature many different methods and terminologies are used, thus making comparison between studies difficult. We review and explain the different methods used for the description of patellofemoral joint motion, compare these methods by experimentation, and propose a standardised method. We found three main methods for describing patellar motion: motion of the patella about femoral body fixed axes, about patellar body fixed axes, and a combination of these. Description about femoral body fixed axes does not make sense clinically. Description about patellar body fixed axes is straightforward, yet the definition of these axes is prone to error due to the lack of anatomical landmarks. The combination method makes most sense clinically and uses more easily found anatomical landmarks. Patellar flexion varied by up to 26% when describing the motion about different axes. Tilt and shift were highly sensitive to the choices of coordinate systems and the axes of motion. The pattern of rotation was consistent between all methods; however, differences between the methods increased with patellar flexion. We propose the description of patello-femoral motion in terms of shift (along a femoral medial-lateral axis), tilt (about the patellar long axis), rotation (about a floating patellar anterior-posterior axis) and flexion (about the femoral medial-lateral axis).

Femur↗

PubMed2002

The shapes of the tibial and femoral articular surfaces in relation to tibiofemoral movement.

We report a study of the shapes of the tibial and femoral articular surfaces in sagittal, frontal and coronal planes which was performed on cadaver knees using two techniques, MRI and computer interpolation of sections of the articular surfaces acquired by a three-dimensional digitiser. The findings using MRI, confirmed in a previous study by dissection, were the same as those using the digitiser. Thus both methods appear to be valid anatomical tools. The tibial and femoral articular surfaces can be divided into anterior segments, contacting from 0 degrees to 20 +/- 10 degrees of flexion, and posterior segments, contacting from 20 +/- 10 degrees to 120 degrees of flexion. The medial and lateral compartments are asymmetrical, particularly anteriorly. Posteromedially, the femur is spherical and is located in a conforming, but partly deficient, tibial socket. Posterolaterally, it is circular only in the sagittal section and the tibia is flat centrally, sloping downwards both anteriorly and posteriorly to receive the meniscal horns. Anteromedially, the femur is convex with a sagittal radius larger than that posteriorly, while the tibia is flat sloping upwards and forwards. Anterolaterally, both the femoral and tibial surfaces are largely deficient. These shapes suggest that medially the femur can rotate on the tibia through three axes intersecting in the middle of the femoral sphere, but that the sphere can only translate anteroposteriorly and even then to a limited extent. Laterally, the femur can freely translate anteroposteriorly, but can only rotate around a transverse axis for that part of the arc, i.e., near extension, during which it comes into contact with the tibia through its flattened distal/medial surface as against its spherical posterior surface.

Femur↗