PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3742676

Techniques for encapsulating bioactive agents into liposomes.

L D Mayer·M B Bally·M J Hope·P R Cullis
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

As a prerequisite for the use of liposomes for delivery of biologically active agents, techniques are required for the efficient and rapid entrapment of such agents in liposomes. Here we review the variety of procedures available for trapping hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds. Considerations which are addressed include factors influencing the choice of a particular liposomal system and techniques for the passive entrapment of drugs in multilamellar vesicles and unilamellar vesicles. Attention is also paid to active trapping procedures relying on the presence of (negatively) charged lipid or transmembrane ion gradients. Such gradients are particularly useful for concentrating lipophilic cationic drugs inside liposomes, allowing trapping efficiencies approaching 100%.

Explore related subjects

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug TherapyHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationKineticsLiposomesPhospholipidsRadioisotopesSolubilityJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L D Mayer, M B Bally, M J Hope, P R Cullis. Techniques for encapsulating bioactive agents into liposomes.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-3084(86)90077-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2021

Deep generative neural network for accurate drug response imputation.

Drug response differs substantially in cancer patients due to inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Particularly, transcriptome context, especially tumor microenvironment, has been shown playing a significant role in shaping the actual treatment outcome. In this study, we develop a deep variational autoencoder (VAE) model to compress thousands of genes into latent vectors in a low-dimensional space. We then demonstrate that these encoded vectors could accurately impute drug response, outperform standard signature-gene based approaches, and appropriately control the overfitting problem. We apply rigorous quality assessment and validation, including assessing the impact of cell line lineage, cross-validation, cross-panel evaluation, and application in independent clinical data sets, to warrant the accuracy of the imputed drug response in both cell lines and cancer samples. Specifically, the expression-regulated component (EReX) of the observed drug response achieves high correlation across panels. Using the well-trained models, we impute drug response of The Cancer Genome Atlas data and investigate the features and signatures associated with the imputed drug response, including cell line origins, somatic mutations and tumor mutation burdens, tumor microenvironment, and confounding factors. In summary, our deep learning method and the results are useful for the study of signatures and markers of drug response.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1992

Aphidicolin selectively kills neuroblastoma cells in vitro.

Aphidicolin is a tetracyclic diterpene antibiotic which is known to inhibit the growth of eucaryotic cells by reversible binding to DNA polymerase alpha without significant effect on cell viability in most common human cell lines. We observed that aphidicolin at a concentration of 5 x 10(-7) M kills all cells of four human neuroblastoma cell lines. In contrast, viability of normal human embryonal cells and of human continuous cell lines including HeLa, H9, A549 and Caco-2 was influenced only moderately by aphidicolin. In addition, neuroblastoma cells were killed after treatment with 5 x 10(-7) M aphidicolin in cocultures with normal embryonal cells which continued to proliferate after removal of aphidicolin. These results show that aphidicolin provides an agent which selectively kills neuroblastoma cells in vitro.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1992

Relationship of cellular glutathione to the cytotoxicity and resistance of seven platinum compounds.

The role of glutathione (GSH) in the effectiveness of and resistance to 7 platinum compounds [5 Pt(II) and 2 Pt(IV) drugs] was evaluated in a 8.6-fold cisplatin (CDDP)-resistant human small cell lung cancer cell line (GLC4/CDDP), the parent GLC4 line, a 3.7-fold CDDP-resistant human embryonal carcinoma cell line (Tera-CP), and the parent Tera line (NTera2/D1). Resistance factors for both CDDP-resistant cell lines were determined after continuous incubation (4 days) with CDDP. Continuous incubation with the other studied platinum drugs revealed complete cross-resistance for carboplatin (CBDCA) and zeniplatin but less for enloplatin (ENLO) and iproplatin in both models. Tetraplatin and lobaplatin showed, respectively, partial and complete cross-resistance in GLC4/CDDP but no cross-resistance in Tera-CP. GSH level, but not glutathione S-transferase activity, of the 4 cell lines correlated with platinum drug concentrations inhibiting cell survival by 50% after continuous incubation (r = 0.86, P < 0.05). GSH depletion by DL-buthionine-S,R-sulfoximine (BSO) increased sensitivity, as measured after a 4-h exposure to the drugs, of GLC4/CDDP for CDDP 2.0-fold, for CBDCA 1.7-fold, for zeniplatin 1.7-fold, and almost to the level of the sensitive GLC4 for ENLO, whereas no effect was observed for lobaplatin and the Pt(IV) compounds iproplatin and tetraplatin. BSO-modulating effect was higher in the sensitive GLC4 line for most compounds; therefore reduction of resistance could be achieved only for CDDP and ENLO. In contrast to GLC4, no modulation occurred in Tera. In Tera-CP BSO increased sensitivity for CDDP 1.5-fold, for CBDCA 1.9-fold, and for zeniplatin 1.2-fold; no effect was observed for ENLO, lobaplatin, and the Pt(IV) compounds. Reduction of CDDP resistance by BSO was known to occur with identical cellular platinum levels and higher Pt-DNA binding in GLC4/CDDP. However, pretreatment with BSO followed by 4 h ENLO incubation increased cellular platinum levels in both GLC4 and GLC4/CDDP while Pt-DNA binding remained unchanged. In conclusion, GSH reflected sensitivity to platinum-containing drugs. However, since the involvement of GSH differed between the models and the various platinum drugs, the effect of modulation with BSO was unpredictable.

Antineoplastic Agents↗