PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3753609

Guidelines for selecting a dietary analysis system.

Abstract

Microcomputers provide an effective and efficient method for dietary data management and analysis. Since the selection of an appropriate software system is a confusing task, prospective users must have a clear statement of needs. Selection of software is simplified when specific data management tasks are defined. This article provides a model for listing dietary analysis needs and priorities. Sample dietary analysis tasks are listed for five areas of responsibility. Prospective users should consider the following characteristics for each system: validity of the data base, soundness of the program's internal operating procedures, clear and complete documentation, an easy-to-read computer output, and credibility of the developer. Characteristics that may vary in importance depending on the user's situation include ability to alter the data base, standard operating procedures, output features, and service policies. By looking carefully at needs and matching needs to available systems, dietitians can apply sophisticated dietary data management and analysis techniques to the nutrition needs of their clients.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G C Frank, S Pelican. 1986. Guidelines for selecting a dietary analysis system.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3753609/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Semantic category imprecision: a connectionist study of the boundaries of word meanings.

The view that word meanings have a discrete symbolic character has led to misleading impressions about their neurobiological basis. We hypothesize that this lexical semantic knowledge is imprecise, overlapping, and widely distributed throughout the human temporal lobes. The present study uses a computer modeling experiment to investigate this hypothesis. The objects in the study are "cups" and "bowls." Thirty connectionist networks were taught that wide containers without handles are "bowls" and that narrow containers with handles are "cups." The network was then asked to identify 14 different cylindrical containers of seven different widths, some with handles and others without. When compared to a study of human performance, the networks manifested the normal pattern of object naming and the normal pattern of individual variability.

Computers