PubMed · 3851406
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Seymour. 1985-10-16. Practice. Open all hours.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3851406/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the variation in the quality of prescription of medicines in Primary Attention Centre in two different periods, 1986 and 1990. DESIGN: Longitudinal, retrospective study with direct intervention. SITE. Primary Attention Centre, Ciudad Badía. PARTICIPANTS: 1986: 9 general practitioners in medicine (GPs) and 7 pediatricians. 1990: 9 Gps, 7 pediatricians, and 7 residential doctors (MFC based) who were not included in the earlier evaluation. INTERVENTION: Once the 1986 prescriptions had been analysed qualitatively, the results were made available to and discussed with the doctors who made out the prescriptions (passive feedback). As ongoing intervention the periodic clinical sessions should be considered. MAIN MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Increase in the substances included in Index/Guide: MG 6.5% and P 13% (p < 0.00001). Increase in the number of substances with an active principle and in the combinations accepted: MG 2.3% and P 9% (p < 0.00001). Increase in the percentage of specialties with high V1: MG 1% (p = 0.12) and P 10% (p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: There has been an increase in the quality of medical prescriptions according to the indicators analysed. There are other external factors that effect prescriptions that are difficult to measure. This type of study allows one to pinpoint the excessive or wrong use of intrinsically not very valuable sub-groups of therapeutic substances, and will serve as a base for indication-prescription studies.
We investigated the impact of a short-lived policy of charging fees to patients attending public-sector outpatient health facilities in Kenya by collecting data on attendance at Nairobi's Special Treatment Clinic for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) before (23 months), during (9 months), and after (15 months) the user-charge period. During the user-charge period, the seasonally adjusted total mean monthly attendance of men decreased significantly to 40% (95% CI 36-45) of that before fees were levied. Attendance rose in the post-user-charge period, but reached only 64% (59-68) of the pre-user-charge level. For women, the adjusted total mean monthly attendance during the user-charge period was reduced significantly to 65% (55-77) of the pre-user-charge level. Mean monthly attendance by women rose in the post-user-charge period to 22% (9-37) above the pre-user-charge level. There was no evidence of an increase in attendance over the course of the user-charge period among either men or women. The introduction of user fees probably increased the number of untreated STDs in the population, with potentially serious long-term health implications. The user-fee experience in Kenya should be carefully evaluated before similar measures are introduced elsewhere.