False-negative results in cervical cytologic studies.

Abstract

The appropriate interval between cervical cytologic screening studies is a matter of considerable controversy, with a major consideration being the problem of false-negative results. To determine the rate of false-negative cervical cytologic results in our laboratory and to determine how these failures occur, tissue-proven cases of carcinoma in situ, invasive squamous-cell carcinoma, endocervical adenocarcinoma and lymphoid malignancy involving the cervix with negative Papanicolaou smears obtained within one year prior to the tissue diagnosis were reviewed. Over the four-year period from 1980 through 1983, 339 patients had tissue-proven cervical malignancies. Of these, 66 had false-negative Papanicolaou smears, representing a 20% overall false-negative rate. These false-negative smears were rescreened. For all types of cervical malignancy, the majority of errors were due to sampling. No malignancy was missed disproportionately by either cytotechnologists or cytopathologists. We plan to utilize these data for quality control purposes and for continued review of future performance.