PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 3866918

[Cohesive gold: analysis using a scanning electron microscope].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Perotti, F Ferrari, M Pezzoli, G C Zoccola. [Cohesive gold: analysis using a scanning electron microscope].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3866918/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Anatomy and physiology of eyelash follicles: relevance to lash ablation procedures.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to define the anatomy of the eyelash follicles in order to improve methods of selective lash ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dimensions of eyelash follicles were determined from histological specimens of the upper and lower lids of 10 patients. For one of these patients, the eyelash follicles were categorized as quiescent or actively growing, according to standard hair-cycle morphology. RESULTS: Follicle dimensions were (mean +/- SD): upper lid follicle depth, 1.8 +/- 0.3 mm; bulb width, 188 +/- 44 microns; shaft width, 205 +/- 28 microns; lower lid follicle depth, 0.9 +/- 0.2 mm; bulb width 132 +/- 19 microns; and shaft width, 158 +/- 26 microns. The upper lid comprised 41% active follicles compared to 15% in the lower lid. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in the anatomy of the follicles between the two lids. For an electrolysis needle to completely contact 95% of all follicles, it must be inserted 2.4 mm into the upper lid and 1.4 mm into the lower lid (mean depth +2 SD). Argon laser ablation requires a beam width of < 200 and < 250 microns for the lower and upper lids, respectively, to treated similar depths as electrolysis. The higher proportion of actively growing upper lid follicles explains why upper lid lashes are longer.

Electrolysis

Physical methods for the management of hirsutism.

Physical methods for the management of unwanted hair are critically reviewed. Electrolysis and thermolysis are popular and medically proven electrochemical and electrosurgical techniques for permanent hair removal. Many patients seek consultation with their physician prior to having this elective procedure performed. Clinical guidelines are presented for a successful consultation with such patients. Many years ago the unregulated practice of x-ray therapy by unlicensed and poorly trained personnel resulted in tragic morbidity and mortality. Some historical parallels exist between this disturbing period and present day electrolysis and thermolysis practice: only twenty-seven states currently require licensing for permanent hair removal, which is a procedure with rare but potentially serious complications.

Electrolysis