PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3880937

Intersecting staple lines in intestinal anastomoses.

Abstract

With the wide application of the stapling instruments in thoracic and general surgery, a number of techniques have been introduced that involve intersecting staple lines. If these simply involve two applications of the liner staplers (TA series), the problem is only one of the effect of the intersection on the circulation, particularly at the corner. With the GIA linear anastomotic instruments or the EEA circular anastomotic instrument, the question arises as to the integrity of the staple line that is cut through by the knives in these instruments. A large experience here and abroad attests to the safety of the TA intersecting lines in intestine and lung, presumably because the circulation continues through the staple line. The use of the circular anastomosing instrument, EEA, across linear staple lines has been spreading clinically with good reports. Studies were undertaken in dogs of the fate of the TA staple lines when the EEA stapler was used for rectal resection or for a Billroth I gastroduodenal reconstruction. In 20 rectal anastomoses and 10 Billroth I reconstructions, there were no leaks, dehiscences, or evidences of failure, whether the EEA transsected the linear staple line once or twice. Most frequently the knife bent the intersected staple and transferred it to the doughnut that was removed. Much less frequently a staple was cleanly transsected by the knife, and only twice did we see no evidence of damage to the staples in the TA line.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M M Ravitch. 1985. Intersecting staple lines in intestinal anastomoses.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3880937/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Intrarenal abscesses due to Ureaplasma urealyticum in a transplanted kidney.

A young woman developed multiple abscesses in her transplanted kidney. Amplification of the 16S rRNA gene with subsequent sequencing revealed Ureaplasma urealyticum as the infectious agent. Microbiological diagnosis and sensitivity testing led to therapy with levofloxacin, resulting in rapid recovery of the patient.

Abscess↗

Intramedullary spinal cord abscess complicating thoracic spondylodiscitis caused by Bacteroides fragilis.

Intramedullary spinal cord abscess associated with infectious spondylodiscitis is a rare entity. The case of a 66-year-old man with an intramedullary spinal cord abscess complicating thoracic spondylodiscitis is presented. The patient was unable to ambulate independently due to weakness of the legs. MR imaging showed findings suggestive of infectious spondylodiscitis at the T5-T6 level associated with epidural and intramedullary spinal cord abscesses. Biopsy of the intervertebral disc was performed and Bacteroides fragilis was isolated. Antibiotic therapy was instituted, and MR imaging of the thoracic spine was performed 6 weeks after the initiation of treatment, showing resolution of the epidural and intramedullary spinal cord abscesses.

Abscess↗

Parapharyngeal abscess in a patient receiving etanercept.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of parapharyngeal abscess associated with Streptococcus viridans in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis receiving treatment with etanercept. CASE SUMMARY: A 40-year-old man diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis had received treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, methotrexate, and deflazacort. Six months prior to admission, the patient had a Disease Activity Score of 3.4; clinicians decided to start treatment with etanercept. Chest X-rays were normal and the tuberculin skin test was negative. Treatment with etanercept plus methotrexate was started. Three months later, methotrexate was discontinued. Six months after etanercept therapy was started, the patient presented to our emergency department with a swelling of his neck, odynophagia, otalgia, and trismus. The clinical course was consistent with parapharyngeal abscess. Etanercept treatment was suspended. The parapharyngeal abscess was drained and intravenous methylprednisolone, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and clindamycin were administered. The parapharyngeal abscess secretion culture was positive for S. viridans and Bacteroides spp. The patient's condition improved with antibiotic therapy; he was discharged 5 days after admission. DISCUSSION: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha plays an essential role in the immune-mediated response to infection. In our patient, the most possible cause of parapharyngeal abscess was considered to be etanercept because of the temporal relationship between exposure to the drug and onset of symptoms. Etanercept was the only drug administered before the abscess developed. Based on the Naranjo probability scale, an association between etanercept and the adverse reaction could be considered possible. CONCLUSIONS: Patients initiated on etanercept therapy should be closely monitored for the development of tuberculosis and other infections. During treatment, all febrile or novel illnesses should be evaluated promptly. If clinical evaluation leads to the suspicion of tuberculosis and other infections associated with etanercept, it should be discontinued immediately.

Abscess↗