PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 39211167

Mannose receptor (MRC1) mediates uptake of dextran in macrophages via receptor-mediated endocytosis.

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Macrophages maintain surveillance of their environment using receptor-mediated endocytosis and pinocytosis. Receptor-mediated endocytosis allows macrophages to recognize and internalize specific ligands whereas macropinocytosis non-selectively internalizes extracellular fluids and solutes. Here, CRISPR/Cas9 whole-genome screens were used to identify genes regulating constitutive and growth factor-stimulated dextran uptake in murine bone-marrow derived macrophages (BMDM). The endocytic mannose receptor c-type 1 ( Mrc1 , also known as CD206) was a top hit in the screen. Targeted gene disruptions of Mrc1 reduced dextran uptake but had little effect on uptake of Lucifer yellow, a fluid-phase marker. Other screen hits also differentially affected the uptake of dextran and Lucifer yellow, indicating the solutes are internalized by different mechanisms. We further deduced that BMDMs take up dextran via MRC1-mediated endocytosis by showing that competition with mannan, a ligand of MRC1, as well as treatment with Dyngo-4a, a dynamin inhibitor, reduced dextran uptake. Finally, we observed that IL4-treated BMDM internalize more dextran than untreated BMDM by upregulating MRC1 expression. These results demonstrate that dextran is not an effective marker for the bulk uptake of fluids and solutes by macropinocytosis since it is internalized by both macropinocytosis and receptor-mediated endocytosis in cells expressing MRC1. This report identifies numerous genes that regulate dextran internalization in primary murine macrophages and predicts cellular pathways and processes regulating MRC1. This work lays the groundwork for identifying specific genes and regulatory networks that regulate MRC1 expression and MRC1-mediated endocytosis in macrophages. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Macrophages constantly survey and clear tissues by specifically and non-specifically internalizing debris and solutes. However, the molecular mechanisms and modes of regulation of these endocytic and macropinocytic processes are not well understood. Here, CRISPR/Cas9 whole genome screens were used to identify genes regulating uptake of dextran, a sugar polymer that is frequently used as a marker macropinocytosis, and compared with Lucifer yellow, a fluorescent dye with no known receptors. The authors identified the mannose receptor as well as other proteins regulating expression of the mannose receptor as top hits in the screen. Targeted disruption of Mrc1 , the gene that encodes mannose receptor, greatly diminished dextran uptake but had no effect on cellular uptake of Lucifer yellow. Furthermore, exposure to the cytokine IL4 upregulated mannose receptor expression on the cell surface and increased uptake of dextran with little effect on Lucifer yellow uptake. Studies seeking to understand regulation of macropinocytosis in macrophages will be confounded by the use of dextran as a fluid-phase marker. MRC1 is a marker of alternatively activated/anti-inflammatory macrophages and is a potential target for delivery of therapeutics to macrophages. This work provides the basis for mechanistic underpinning of how MRC1 contributes to the receptor-mediated uptake of carbohydrates and glycoproteins from the tissue milieu and distinguishes genes regulating receptor-mediated endocytosis from those regulating the bona fide fluid-phase uptake of fluids and solutes by macropinocytosis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jared Wollman, Kevin Wanniarachchi, Bijaya Pradhan, Lu Huang, Jason G Kerkvliet, Adam D Hoppe, Natalie W Thiex. 2024-08-13. Mannose receptor (MRC1) mediates uptake of dextran in macrophages via receptor-mediated endocytosis.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.13.607841

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article