Auditory profile analysis: frequency, phase, and Weber's law.

D M Green; C R Mason

doi:10.1121/1.392179

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3980867

Auditory profile analysis: frequency, phase, and Weber's law.

D M Green·C R Mason

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper reports three separate experiments on different aspects of performance in auditory profile analysis. The first experiment deals with the effects of the frequency and position of an increment in a single component of a multitonal complex. The general results indicate that detection of the signal is easier for components in the mid-frequency range (around 1000 Hz) independent of signal position within the complex. The second experiment investigates the effects of relative phase of the individual components of the complex. Regardless of the number of components, our results indicate that phase has very little effect, even when different phases are selected for each presentation. The third experiment compares the detection of an increment in intensity of a single component, the traditional Weber fraction experiment, and conditions where additional components are present, a profile experiment. The detection of the increment is measured as a function of the level of the standard. The single-tone condition shows the usual near miss to Weber's law whereas the multitone condition does not. In addition, threshold for the increment is better for the multitone condition than for the single tone condition for levels of the standard up to 70 dB SPL. This last result is investigated for ten observers, five of whom were experienced in profile tasks and five of whom were not. Using a low level standard, the five experienced observers replicate the results described above. The inexperienced observers show the opposite result. On average, they are better able to detect the increment in the single-component condition.

Explore related subjects

Auditory Threshold Humans Loudness Perception Pitch Perception Psychoacoustics Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

D M Green, C R Mason. 1985. Auditory profile analysis: frequency, phase, and Weber's law.. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392179

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

A dual-process integrator-resonator model of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve.

A phenomenological dual-process model of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve is presented and compared to threshold and loudness data from cochlear implant users. The auditory nerve is modeled as two parallel processes derived from linearized equations of conductance-based models. The first process is an integrator, which dominates stimulation for short-phase duration biphasic pulses and high-frequency sinusoidal stimuli. It has a relatively short time constant (0.094 ms) arising from the passive properties of the membrane. The second process is a resonator, which induces nonmonotonic functions of threshold vs frequency with minima around 80 Hz. The ion channel responsible for this trend has a relatively large relaxation time constant of about 1 ms. Membrane noise is modeled as a Gaussian noise, and loudness sensation is assumed to relate to the probability of firing of a neuron during a 20-ms rectangular window. Experimental psychophysical results obtained in seven previously published studies can be interpreted with this model. The model also provides a physiologically based account of the nonmonotonic threshold vs frequency functions observed in biphasic and sinusoidal stimulation, the large threshold decrease obtained with biphasic pulses having a relatively long inter-phase gap and the effects of asymmetric pulses.

Auditory Threshold↗

PubMed2007

Connexin 26 deafness is not always congenital.

OBJECTIVE: Hearing loss associated with mutations of the GJB2, the gene encoding Connexin 26 (Cx26), is described as a prelingual, bilateral, prevalently stable sensorineural defect ranging in severity from mild to profound. Despite many clinical studies, there is still a limited knowledge about the severity of Cx26 hearing loss at birth, in the postnatal period or in early infancy; some authors have reported about a possible variable age of onset. The aim of this work was to investigate the characteristics of Cx26 hearing loss and test the hypothesis of a postnatal sudden and severe deterioration of the hearing capacity in cases with uncertain age at onset. METHODS: We have studied 79 children with molecularly documented biallelic Cx26 hearing loss by evaluating longitudinal audiometric characteristics and the results of a questionnaire administered to the parents, regarding the auditory behavior of their children at 3 and 6 months of age. RESULTS: More than 50% of children with profound hearing loss were described as having normal auditory behavior at three months of age, and at least 20% of these children were consistently reported by the parents to maintain normal auditory development up to 6 months of age. None of the studied children showed significant progression in hearing loss from the time of diagnosis through their last follow-up. In a few cases these reports were supported by objective audiometric evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, we hypothesize that Cx26 profound hearing loss may be not always congenital, with the possibility of an early window of "functional time" before the final defect is established. The hypothesis of an early auditory input makes timing of detection and intervention critical to minimize the deleterious effects of a functional deprivation. In a near future, the combination of genetic testing with universal neonatal hearing screening and audiological surveillance will provide invaluable information about the natural history of the most frequent sensory defect in infancy and will consequently allow to maximize the quality of intervention.

Auditory Threshold↗

PubMed2006

Parental suspicion of hearing loss in children with otitis media with effusion.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the parental suspicion of hearing loss in children with otitis media with effusion (OME). As part of a population-based survey in a screening programme among 6- to 7-year-old Chinese children in Hong Kong, OME cases and controls were studied for the value of parental observations in the prediction of OME and hearing test results. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Prior to the otoscopic and tympanometric examination of the children on school premises, a self-administered binary-choice question was sent to the parents asking whether there was any suspicion of hearing impairment. Positive screens and randomly selected negative screens were seen in a hospital clinic for the confirmation of case and control status 2 to 3 weeks after the school screening. Aural examination under microscopy, repeated tympanometry and stapedial reflex testing, and pure-tone audiometry (PTA) were conducted, and 117 cases and 159 controls were included in this study. RESULTS: The average PTA conductive threshold levels in the individual children with OME ranged from 3.8 dB to 40.0 dB with a group mean of 17.0 dB in the better-hearing ears. Parental suspicion of hearing deficit was significantly associated with OME (p<0.001) but not PTA findings (p=0.686). The sensitivity of parent-suspected hearing impairment to detect OME however was very low (19.7%). DISCUSSION: In other words, if we had relied on parental suspicion as the first screening, at least 80% of the OME cases would have been missed. We conclude that the parental suspicion of hearing loss is inadequate for the identification of mild hearing loss as caused by OME. Health education is recommended to improve parental awareness of the disease.

Auditory Threshold↗