PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 398520

Urinary tract stone disease.

Abstract

Patients suffering from urinary stone are traditionally referred to a surgeon. Most are investigated only as far as establishing the site of the stone and its effect on renal function. Although a number of patients may require surgery, the majority pass the stone spontaneously and are discharged within a few days. If the patient has a recurrence, as most eventually have, it is not routine practice to establish the type of stone, screen for underlying disease, identify the urinary abnormalities or to institute preventive medical treatment. Although it was considered that surgery itself had something to offer in reducing the recurrence rate this is no longer generally held except in infected stone disease. Nevertheless it is still uncommon to involve a physician, and in particular a nephrologist, in the investigation and management of urinary stone-formers. Urinary stone disease still remains, to a large extent, outside the field of nephrology.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Peacock, W G Robertson, P J Heyburn, A Rutherford. 1979. Urinary tract stone disease.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/398520/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Malaria parasitaemia in neonates with predisposing risk factors for neonatal sepsis: report of six cases.

In a study of neonatal malaria at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, we documented the features of six neonates in an effort to highlight that the manifestations of malaria in the newborn cannot be readily distinguished from those of neonatal sepsis. Maternal peripartum fever, an important identifiable risk factor for neonatal sepsis, also featured prominently in the mothers of these babies. These mothers ingested pyrimethamine weekly in the course of their pregnancy. All six neonates were critically ill. Their cultures of blood, CSF and urine for bacterial pathogens yielded no growth and they were unresponsive to conventional antibiotics. The diagnosis of malaria should be considered, in spite of regular maternal ingestion of antimalarial prophylaxis with pyrimethamine, in critically ill neonates in malarious areas. All six neonates responded satisfactorily to oral doses of chloroquine. We therefore suggest that a blood film for malaria parasites be included in screening for neonatal sepsis as part of the initial work-up.

Bacterial Infections

The predictive value of CRP and I/T-ratio in neonatal infection.

C-reactive protein (CRP) and immature: total neutrophil ratio (I/T-ratio) were evaluated as tests to detect neonatal sepsis in a prospective study in 185 neonates. The positive predictive values (P.P.A.) of CRP and I/T-ratio when used for screening for infection were 20-30% in early onset and 50-60% in late onset infection. In patients with clinical signs of infection the P.P.A. of CRP and I/T-ratio was 35-45% in early onset and 65-70% in late onset infection. For the whole group of patients the negative predictive accuracy (N.P.A.) of both CRP and I/T-ratio was high, in early as well as in late onset infection (90-98%). Based on incidence rates of 7.5% and 23% for early and late onset infection respectively the chance that the infant was not infected was already 92.5% and 77% for the two types of infection. In conclusion, CRP and I/T-ratio determination are of limited value as diagnostic tests in neonatal infection.

Bacterial Infections