PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 4034761

Improving the accuracy of burn-surface estimation.

Abstract

A user-friendly computer-assisted method of calculating total body surface area burned (TBSAB) has been developed. This method is more accurate, faster, and subject to less error than conventional methods. For comparison, the ability of 30 physicians to estimate TBSAB was tested. Parameters studied included the effect of prior burn care experience, the influence of burn size, the ability to accurately sketch the size of burns on standard burn charts, and the ability to estimate percent TBSAB from the sketches. Despite the ability for physicians of all levels of training to accurately sketch TBSAB, significant burn size over-estimation (p less than 0.01) and large interrater variability of potential consequence was noted. Direct benefits of a computerized system are many. These include the need for minimal user experience and the ability for wound-trend analysis, permanent record storage, calculation of fluid and caloric requirements, hemodynamic parameters, and the ability to compare meaningfully the different treatment protocols.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L S Nichter, J Williams, C A Bryant, R F Edlich. 1985. Improving the accuracy of burn-surface estimation.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198509000-00017

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems revisited: their validity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems.

With the advent of multi-channel EEG hardware systems and the concurrent development of topographic and tomographic signal source localization methods, the international 10/20 system, a standard system for electrode positioning with 21 electrodes, was extended to higher density electrode settings such as 10/10 and 10/5 systems, allowing more than 300 electrode positions. However, their effectiveness as relative head-surface-based positioning systems has not been examined. We previously developed a virtual 10/20 measurement algorithm that can analyze any structural MR head and brain image. Extending this method to the virtual 10/10 and 10/5 measurement algorithms, we analyzed the MR images of 17 healthy subjects. The acquired scalp positions of the 10/10 and 10/5 systems were normalized to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) stereotactic coordinates and their spatial variability was assessed. We described and examined the effects of spatial variability due to the selection of positioning systems and landmark placement strategies. As long as a detailed rule for a particular system was provided, it yielded precise landmark positions on the scalp. Moreover, we evaluated the effective spatial resolution of 329 scalp landmark positions of the 10/5 system for multi-subject studies. As long as a detailed rule for landmark setting was provided, 241 scalp positions could be set effectively when there was no overlapping of two neighboring positions. Importantly, 10/10 positions could be well separated on a scalp without overlapping. This study presents a referential framework for establishing the effective spatial resolutions of 10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems as relative head-surface-based positioning systems.

Body Surface Area↗

Population clinical pharmacology of children: modelling covariate effects.

INTRODUCTION: Population modelling using mixed effects models provides a means to study variability in paediatric drug responses among individuals representative of those in whom the drug will be used clinically. DISCUSSIONS: Explanatory covariates explain the predictable part of the between-individual variability. Growth and development are two major aspects of children not seen in adults. These aspects can be investigated by using size and age as covariates. Problems attributable to co-linearity can be approached by using size as the first covariate. Size standardisation is achieved using allometric scaling, a mechanistic approach that has a strong theoretical and empirical basis. Age is used to describe the maturation of clearance. The quantitative models (linear, exponential, first-order, variable slope sigmoidal) used to describe this maturation process vary depending on the span of the ages under investigation. Measures of response are not always straightforward and can be more difficult to quantify in children. CONCLUSION: Covariate investigation in children is improving the understanding of developmental aspects of drug disposition and effects in the paediatric population, ultimately leading to more effective use of medications.

Body Surface Area↗

Evaluating a new method to judge dialysis treatment using online measurements of ionic clearance.

New technology now supports direct online measurements of total dialysis dose per treatment, Kt. An outcome-based, nonlinear method for estimating target Kt in terms of ionic clearance measurements and body surface area (BSA) has been described recently. This is a validation study of the new method that evaluates the relationship between the (actual Kt-target Kt) difference and death risk. Patients with Kt measurements during March 2004 were identified (N=59,644). Target Kt was determined for each patient using the new method. Patients were then grouped by (actual Kt-target Kt) decile. They were also grouped by (actual URR-target URR) decile. Cox analysis-based risk profiles were constructed using those groupings. The (actual Kt-target Kt) difference profiles suggested improving death risk as Kt increased from below target to equal target. Risk ratios then flattened and remained so until (actual Kt-target Kt) reached the highest decile at which it appeared to improve, suggesting a possible biphasic profile. The (URR-target URR) risk profile was U-shaped. Death risk was related to the difference between the actual Kt and a target Kt value selected using the new nonlinear method. The method is therefore valid for prescribing and monitoring hemodialysis treatment.

Body Surface Area↗