PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 4064398

Closed Zickel nailing.

Abstract

A closed technique for Zickel nail insertion decreases morbidity, blood loss, and operative time. The Zickel intramedullary nail was originally developed as an open fixation device for fractures of the proximal third of the femur and subtrochanteric area. The open technique requires a lengthy incision, moderate blood loss, and time for insertion. For pathologic or impending pathologic fractures in sick patients, such a major operation is undesirable. The closed technique has been used successfully in five impending pathologic, three pathologic, and two traumatic subtrochanteric fractures. For these ten patients, the average operating time was one hour and 28 minutes with an average blood loss of 400 ml, a reduction of 40 minutes and 460 ml, respectively, over other available data. Time to ambulation and length of hospital stay are comparable to fractures treated openly. The closed technique is ideal for impending pathologic fractures, but may also be applicable to any pathologic or traumatic fractures that do not require an open procedure for alignment or supplementary fixation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A D Davis, R D Meyer, M E Miller, J T Killian. 1985. Closed Zickel nailing.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4064398/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Intramedullary fixation of tibial shaft fractures using an expandable nail.

Interlocking intramedullary nails are the gold standard for treating tibial fractures. We compared the clinical and economic factors associated with tibial fracture fixation using either interlocking intramedullary or expandable nails. From 2000 to 2002, 53 patients with 53 diaphyseal tibial fractures of similar characteristics (AO/OTA 42A1-B3) were randomly and prospectively treated with either interlocking (n = 26) or expandable nails (n = 27). Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years. The mean surgical duration was 104 minutes with interlocking nails and 52.9 minutes with expandable nails. Rehospitalizations were required in 12 patients (46%) and reoperations were required in nine patients (35%) with interlocking nails. Only one patient (3%) with an expandable nail required rehospitalization and reoperation. Union was achieved after 17 weeks (mean) with interlocking nails and 11.5 weeks with expandable nails. The beneficial economic ramifications of using expandable nails were a 39% reduction in overall surgical and hospital expenses. Expandable nails showed important clinical advantages for tibial fracture fixation, and complications related to lengthy operations, reoperations, and rehospitalizations were substantially reduced. Overall treatment cost was substantially lower with expandable nails. Based on these advantages, simplicity in use, and short surgical time, we recommend an expandable nail for treating tibial (AO Type A, B) shaft fractures.

Bone Nails↗

Fractured neck of femur in a child after femoral fracture fixation by intramedullary flexible nails: a case report.

Since the introduction of flexible intramedullary nails, the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in adolescents has been revolutionized and this has become the routine treatment in most units, with minimal complications. We report a rare complication of an ipsilateral fractured neck of femur in a fit and healthy 12-year-old girl 6 months after treatment of a traumatic fractured femoral shaft; this was treated effectively with cannulated screws and the patient was successfully discharged without any further complication.

Bone Nails↗