PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 40766702

Targeting CyclinD1-CDK6 to Mitigate Senescence-Driven Inflammation and Age-Associated Functional Decline.

Abstract

Cellular senescence contributes to aging and age-related diseases by driving chronic inflammation through the Senescence Associated Secretory Phenotype (SASP) and interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs). Cyclin D1 (CCND1), a key cell cycle regulator, is paradoxically upregulated in these non-proliferating cells. We show that CCND1 and its kinase partner CDK6 drive SASP and ISG expression in senescent cells by promoting DNA damage accumulation. This leads to the formation of cytoplasmic chromatin fragments (CCFs) that activate pro-inflammatory CGAS-STING signaling. The tumor suppressor p53 (TP53) and its target p21 (CDKN2A) antagonize this CCND1-CDK6-dependent DNA damage accumulation pathway to suppress the SASP. In aged mouse livers, senescent hepatocytes show increased Ccnd1 expression. Hepatocyte-specific Ccnd1 knockout or treatment with the Cdk4/6 inhibitor Palbociclib reduces DNA damage and ISGs in aged mouse liver. Notably, Palbociclib also suppresses frailty and improves physical performance of aged mice. These findings reveal a novel role for CCND1/CDK6 in regulating DNA damage and inflammation in senescence and aging, highlighting it as a promising therapeutic target.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Adarsh Rajesh, Aaron P Havas, Rouven Arnold, Kathryn Lande, K Garrett Evensen, Kelly Yichen Li, Sainath Mamde, Qian Yang, Armin Gandhi, Karl N Miller, Marcos Garcia Teneche, Zoe Yao, Jessica Proulx, Andrew Davis, Laurence Haddadin, Michael Alcaraz, Carolina C Macip, Brightany Li, Xue Lei, Charlene Miciano, Elizabeth Smoot, Allen Wang, Jeffrey H Albrecht, April E Williams, Bing Ren, Kevin Y Yip, Peter D Adams. 2025-08-02. Targeting CyclinD1-CDK6 to Mitigate Senescence-Driven Inflammation and Age-Associated Functional Decline.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.01.668243

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article