PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 4083801

Foreskin fallacies and phimosis.

H L Tan
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Routine circumcision is gaining popularity in our community, as it is said to be a safe and painless operation in the neonate, and offers improved hygiene. That the circumcised foreskin is cleaner is undisputed, but whether the operation is safe is questioned. This article reviews the common problems encountered, and also reviews the physiology of the foreskin. The pros and cons of circumcision is discussed together with some complications of circumcision. The view is expressed that routine circumcision should not be encouraged.

Explore related subjects

Circumcision, MaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePhimosisPostoperative ComplicationsSmegmaJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H L Tan. 1985. Foreskin fallacies and phimosis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4083801/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Postcircumcision necrosis of the glans penis: gray-scale and color Doppler sonographic findings.

We report the case of a 2-week-old male infant who developed necrosis of the glans penis as a result of circumcision. Based on the clinical absence of impairment of micturition on gray-scale and color Doppler sonographic findings, which showed the relatively superficial necrosis of the skin layers without underlying damage to the corpora cavernosa or urethra, a conservative approach was chosen with a good prognosis. A 4-month follow-up sonograpic examination revealed evidence of glans healing with superficial skin epithelization. These findings may lead to mild cosmetic damage, but no future functional complications are expected. To our knowledge, this is the first report of gray-scale and color Doppler sonographic evaluation of the ischemic process of the glans in a neonate with this rare complication of circumcision.

Circumcision, Male↗
PubMed2007

Male circumcision as a preventive measure against HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In 2005, 4.1 million people were infected with HIV. There is an urgent need to intensify and expand HIV prevention methods. Male circumcision is one of several potential approaches. This review summarizes recent evidence for the potential of male circumcision to prevent HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. RECENT FINDINGS: The first randomized controlled trial of adult male circumcision found a highly significant 60% reduction in HIV incidence among men in the intervention arm. Modelling this effect predicts that widespread implementation of male circumcision could avert 2 million HIV infections over the next decade in sub-Saharan Africa. The biological rationale is that the foreskin increases risk of HIV infection due to the high density of HIV target cells and lack of keratinization of the inner mucosal surface. SUMMARY: There is strong evidence that male circumcision reduces risk of HIV, syphilis and chancroid. If results are confirmed by two ongoing trials in sub-Saharan Africa, provision of safe male circumcision could be added to HIV prevention packages in high-incidence settings. This would also provide an opportunity for HIV-prevention education and counselling to young men at high risk of infection.

Circumcision, Male↗