PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 40936796

Direct Oral Anticoagulant Transition Strategies Using Anti-Xa Concentrations Upon Intensive Care Unit Admission.

Abstract

Background: The increased utilization of oral factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI) has led to a growing interest in the clinical utility of FXaI-specific anti-Xa concentrations. Critically ill populations are at risk of bleeding secondary to FXaI accumulation in the setting of end-organ dysfunction. To mitigate this risk, an FXaI anti-Xa concentration-guided approach to transitioning between oral and parenteral anticoagulation has been explored. Objective: To compare the incidence of bleeding upon intensive care unit (ICU) admission between 2 different FXaI transition strategies: concentration versus non-concentration-guided. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients admitted between January 2019 and May 2022 with objective evidence of FXaI exposure within 48 hours preceding ICU admission. Patients were excluded if they were admitted to the ICU with a primary diagnosis related to a bleeding event, received a non-FXaI anticoagulant 48 hours preceding ICU admission, remained off anticoagulation during their ICU admission, or underwent surgical procedures. The primary outcome was the incidence of major bleeding within 5 days of ICU admission. Thromboembolic events were evaluated as a secondary endpoint. Results: A total of 433 patients (184 concentration-guided vs 249 non-concentration-guided) were included. There was no difference in major bleeding between groups (2.7% in concentration-guided vs 3.6% in non-concentration-guided; P = 0.79). Thromboembolic complications were similar between groups (1.6% in concentration-guided vs 2.0% in non-concentration-guided; P = 1.00) despite a longer time from last FXaI dose to anticoagulant transition in the concentration-guided group (29.9 hours vs 19.4 hours; P < 0.01). Conclusion and relevance: Use of FXaI concentrations to guide anticoagulation transition in the ICU had no impact on major bleeding events or thromboembolic complications. Further analyses are needed to validate FXaI concentration-guided strategies and solidify anti-Xa cutoffs to create a standardized approach to FXaI transitions in the critically ill patient population.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mariah I Sigala, Corey V Dinunno, Chelsea N Lopez, Luma Succar, Jenny H Petkova, Edward A Graviss, Duc T Nguyen, Kevin R Donahue. 2025-09-09. Direct Oral Anticoagulant Transition Strategies Using Anti-Xa Concentrations Upon Intensive Care Unit Admission.. https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225251372486

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Receiving a Prescription for a Direct Oral Anticoagulant Among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation on Hospice Admission.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is prevalent in hospice care, but anticoagulation decisions in this population are not well understood. In this cross-sectional study, we described the prevalence and characteristics associated with direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prescription on hospice admission. We used electronic health data from adult decedents with AF in a large, for-profit hospice chain in the United States between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019. We used multivariable logistic regression with results reported as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Among 13,233 decedents, mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 84.2 (9.9) years, 53.6% were female, 65.1% were White, and 56.1% were referred to hospice from a hospital. Mean (SD) CHA2DS2-VASc score were 3.8 (1.4) for males and 4.8 (1.3) for females, and mean (SD) HAS-BLED score was 2.2 (1.0). Overall, 8% of patients received a DOAC prescription on hospice admission. Characteristics associated with receiving a DOAC prescription included PPS scores of &#x2265; 20% (compared to scores < 20%), and receiving hospice care at home, nursing home, assisted living facility, or residential care home (compared to inpatient hospice). Further studies about the risks and benefits of DOAC use are needed to optimize decision-making in this population.

DOAC