SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DOAC”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-associated thrombosis is a condition associated with high mortality rates, yet limited evidence exists regarding the safety and effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), focusing on a fixed follow-up period based on clinical practice guideline recommendations. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of DOACs versus LMWH in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis over a 6-month follow-up period. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched up to 30 June, 2025. Recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials and 28 cohort studies were included in our systematic review. After applying the criteria for a 6-month follow-up period, five randomized controlled trials and 16 cohort studies with 49,824 patients were analyzed in the meta-analysis. In randomized controlled trials, DOACs showed a lower incidence of venous thromboembolism recurrence (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.87) compared with LMWH, with a non-significant increase in major bleeding (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.87-1.88) and no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86-1.18). Cohort studies demonstrated a lower incidence of venous thromboembolism recurrence (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.62-0.76) with DOACs, a non-significant reduction in major bleeding (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68-1.07), and a lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.72). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cancer-associated thrombosis, DOACs demonstrated a decrease in recurrent venous thromboembolism without increasing the risk of all-cause mortality. A non-significant increase in the risk of major bleeding was recorded in randomized controlled trials, but not in cohort studies. DOACs may provide greater effectiveness for cancer-associated thrombosis compared with LMWH.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Direct Oral Anticoagulants as Primary or Secondary Treatment for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) and Associated Thromboembolism (HITT)-A Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is associated with a high risk for thrombosis. The role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is still emerging and data are limited considering efficacy and safety among patients with HIT. The aim of this review is to evaluate current data on DOACs as primary or secondary treatment among patients with HIT. METHODS: This is a systematic review utilising Pubmed, Scopus and Embase online databases. Eligible studies were published up to December 2024 evaluating DOACs as primary or secondary treatment among patients with HIT and/or associated thrombosis (HITT). Primary outcomes included thrombosis rate (TR) and bleeding rate (BR) during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 44 publications were included (29 case reports, 5 case studies and 10 cohort studies [n > 10 patients]). Regarding treatment, 19 articles evaluated only rivaroxaban, 7 articles only apixaban, 11 articles only dabigatran and 7 articles more than one regimen. A total of 352 patients were included. Overall, 190 patients (53.8%) were given DOAC as primary treatment whereas 162 patients were given a parenteral treatment first and continued with a DOAC. Mean nadir platelet count at diagnosis was 63 000/μL. HITT rate was 190/352 (53.9%; 8% had arterial thrombosis). Mean follow-up was 7.6 months. TR was 20/352 (Pooled proportion = 0.064 [95% CI = 0.042-0.092]) (30% of them were new thromboses without initial thrombosis), and BR was 9/352 (Pooled proportion = 0.039 [95% CI = 0.022-0.062]). Finally, there was no difference found regarding TR and BR between primary or secondary treatment, and among different regimens. CONCLUSIONS: DOACs are associated with low rates of thrombosis and major bleeding among patients treated for HIT or HITT, either as primary or secondary treatment. However, the certainty of evidence is very low because of the quality and limitations of the available studies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Receiving a Prescription for a Direct Oral Anticoagulant Among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation on Hospice Admission.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is prevalent in hospice care, but anticoagulation decisions in this population are not well understood. In this cross-sectional study, we described the prevalence and characteristics associated with direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prescription on hospice admission. We used electronic health data from adult decedents with AF in a large, for-profit hospice chain in the United States between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019. We used multivariable logistic regression with results reported as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Among 13,233 decedents, mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 84.2 (9.9) years, 53.6% were female, 65.1% were White, and 56.1% were referred to hospice from a hospital. Mean (SD) CHA2DS2-VASc score were 3.8 (1.4) for males and 4.8 (1.3) for females, and mean (SD) HAS-BLED score was 2.2 (1.0). Overall, 8% of patients received a DOAC prescription on hospice admission. Characteristics associated with receiving a DOAC prescription included PPS scores of ≥ 20% (compared to scores < 20%), and receiving hospice care at home, nursing home, assisted living facility, or residential care home (compared to inpatient hospice). Further studies about the risks and benefits of DOAC use are needed to optimize decision-making in this population.

DOAC↗

PubMed2025

Exome-wide association study of bleeding events in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants.

BackgroundDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are first-line medications for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, variability in drug response poses risks of hemorrhagic or thromboembolic events.ObjectivesAlthough genetic influences on DOACs safety are increasingly recognized, robust evidence directly linking specific polymorphisms to bleeding risk remains limited.DesignMulti-center observational case-control study including exome-wide association analysis of 196 non-valvular AF patients treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban, comprising 97 with bleeding complications and 99 without.MethodsDOAC plasma concentrations, urinary 6-β-hydroxycortisol and cortisol levels were measured for CYP3A4 phenotyping. Sequencing was performed on the DNBSEQ G-400 platform. Single-nucleotide variant (SNV) associations with bleeding risk were assessed using logistic regression with additive, dominant, and recessive genetic models. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) were calculated to evaluate cumulative genetic effects.ResultsNo SNVs reached Bonferroni-corrected significance under any model. PRSs showed weak predictive ability for bleeding with apixaban. For rivaroxaban, regression indicated that ln Css min/D + 1 index increased with PRS, age, and 6-β-hydroxycortisol/cortisol ratio, but decreased with higher 6-β-hydroxycortisol and coronary heart disease presence. No statistically significant differences were found for the PharmGKB Level 3 variants rs1045642 (rivaroxaban) and rs2231142 (apixaban). Trends toward statistical significance were observed for the rs2472304-G variant in rivaroxaban users, rs6977165-C in apixaban users, and for the CYP3A4*1/*36 diplotype.ConclusionResidual equilibrium concentration of DOACs, including dose-adjusted, did not independently predict bleeding risk in non-valvular AF patients. Variants rs2472304 and rs6977165 may warrant further investigation as potential contributors to bleeding risk.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Direct Oral Anticoagulant Transition Strategies Using Anti-Xa Concentrations Upon Intensive Care Unit Admission.

Background: The increased utilization of oral factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI) has led to a growing interest in the clinical utility of FXaI-specific anti-Xa concentrations. Critically ill populations are at risk of bleeding secondary to FXaI accumulation in the setting of end-organ dysfunction. To mitigate this risk, an FXaI anti-Xa concentration-guided approach to transitioning between oral and parenteral anticoagulation has been explored. Objective: To compare the incidence of bleeding upon intensive care unit (ICU) admission between 2 different FXaI transition strategies: concentration versus non-concentration-guided. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients admitted between January 2019 and May 2022 with objective evidence of FXaI exposure within 48 hours preceding ICU admission. Patients were excluded if they were admitted to the ICU with a primary diagnosis related to a bleeding event, received a non-FXaI anticoagulant 48 hours preceding ICU admission, remained off anticoagulation during their ICU admission, or underwent surgical procedures. The primary outcome was the incidence of major bleeding within 5 days of ICU admission. Thromboembolic events were evaluated as a secondary endpoint. Results: A total of 433 patients (184 concentration-guided vs 249 non-concentration-guided) were included. There was no difference in major bleeding between groups (2.7% in concentration-guided vs 3.6% in non-concentration-guided; P = 0.79). Thromboembolic complications were similar between groups (1.6% in concentration-guided vs 2.0% in non-concentration-guided; P = 1.00) despite a longer time from last FXaI dose to anticoagulant transition in the concentration-guided group (29.9 hours vs 19.4 hours; P < 0.01). Conclusion and relevance: Use of FXaI concentrations to guide anticoagulation transition in the ICU had no impact on major bleeding events or thromboembolic complications. Further analyses are needed to validate FXaI concentration-guided strategies and solidify anti-Xa cutoffs to create a standardized approach to FXaI transitions in the critically ill patient population.

DOAC↗