PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 40950474

Integrative genomics elucidates the evolutionary, temporal, and developmental origins of a hydrocephalus risk gene.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A prior integrative, multi-omics human genetics and functional genomics study identified maelstrom (MAEL), a gene involved in regulation of DNA transposon activity and genome structure, as a transcriptome-wide predictor of hydrocephalus (HC) in the brain cortex. Here we expand on this discovery and further characterize the evolutionary origin and expression of MAEL across developmental timescales and cell-lineages in the neonatal human brain towards a mechanistic understanding how variation in MAEL expression may cause HC. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the evolutionary, temporal, developmental, and lineages of MAEL expression in HC and the developing human brain. METHODS: Ensembl was used to delineate the evolution and taxonomy of MAEL across species. Analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of 49 brain regions across pre- and post-natal timescales from the Developing Human Brain Atlas (Allen Institute) identified temporal and spatial MAEL expression patterns. We quantified MAEL expression in primary cortical brain tissue obtained during the surgical treatment of HC. RESULTS: We performed taxonomic gene-mapping to define the evolutionary origin of MAEL to assess suitability for mechanistic characterization in vitro and in vivo across species. We find that MAEL is among the top 0.01% human-specific genes and < 50% sequence homology among commonly used model organisms with highly divergent functions, necessitating mechanistic validation in human tissue. scRNA-seq of the non-disease prenatal human brain identified MAEL expression enriched in cortical excitatory neurons, which was recapitulated in primary HC brain tissue obtained during surgery. Finally, using scRNA-seq of primary HC brain tissue, we functionally validated reduced MAEL expression, consistent with a prior human TWAS analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We identify the evolutionary, temporal, and developmental expression pattern of MAEL in the neonatal human brain. We also provide direct evidence for reduced MAEL expression in human HC brain tissue. These data, at least in part, implicate reduced MAEL expression underlying human HC across etiologies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andrew T Hale, Yuwei Song, Caroline Davies, Shanrun Liu, Regan Gaskin, Anastasia Arynchyna-Smith, Brandon G Rocque, Zechen Chong. 2025-09-02. Integrative genomics elucidates the evolutionary, temporal, and developmental origins of a hydrocephalus risk gene.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.01.25334358

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article