PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 41001483

Expanded Chromatin Accessibility Mapping Explains Genetic Variation Associated with Complex Traits in Liver.

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified thousands of loci associated with a variety of common, complex human traits. Recent efforts have focused on characterizing chromatin accessibility to discover regulatory elements that modify the expression of nearby genes, suggesting that trait associations are mediated through changes in gene regulation. Genetic variants associated with differences in chromatin accessibility, known as chromatin accessibility quantitative trait loci (caQTLs), are established contributors to gene expression differences, providing mechanistic hypotheses for signals identified by GWAS. Using the assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing (ATAC-seq), we assessed chromatin accessibility in 189 diverse human liver samples, identifying over two million accessible chromatin regions enriched for gene regulatory features and, in 175 of these samples, over 14,000 caQTLs. Focusing subsequently on liver-relevant complex traits, we obtained publicly available blood lipids GWAS data and identified 157 loci where caQTLs, expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), and GWAS signals colocalized. This generated specific molecular hypotheses about regulatory elements, affected genes, and, in some cases, implicated transcription factors. Finally, we enumerated the set of blood lipid trait signals that lack an obvious proposed mechanism beyond catalogs of liver caQTLs and eQTLs. After integrating 10 multi-omic QTL regulatory mechanism datasets whilst considering limitations in statistical power, we found that approximately 20% of blood lipid GWAS signals lacked a statistical link to a proposed mechanism. Our results demonstrate the value of integrating multiple genomic datasets to improve understanding of GWAS signals, while emphasizing the need for additional experimental approaches to fully characterize complex trait associations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Brandon M Wenz, Max F Dudek, Shweta Ramdas, Kate Townsend Creasy, Dong Xin, Kim M Olthoff, Abraham Shaked, Daniel J Rader, Christopher D Brown, Benjamin F Voight. 2025-09-15. Expanded Chromatin Accessibility Mapping Explains Genetic Variation Associated with Complex Traits in Liver.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.15.25335593

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article