PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 41040161

RHO1-2 meganuclease gene editing targets human P23H rhodopsin-induced retinitis pigmentosa to rejuvenate rods and maintain cones.

Abstract

Autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP) is an inherited retinal dystrophy characterized by progressive vision loss and eventual blindness. The P23H mutation (proline to histidine substitution at codon 23) in the rhodopsin (RHO) gene represents the most common form of adRP in North Americans. Currently, there is no cure for P23H adRP. Genome editing targeting the mutant RHO allele, leaving a functional wildtype (WT) allele, is an attractive approach for P23H adRP, as only one copy of RHO is needed for normal retinal function. We re-engineered an I-Cre meganuclease, called RHO1-2, to target a 22bp recognition sequence encompassing the mutation responsible for the p.P23H RHO mutation. In vitro, RHO1-2, cuts human P23H RHO but not WT RHO. In vivo, we delivered scAAV5:GRK1:RHO1-2 via subretinal injection in early-stage degeneration using the only large animal model of human p.P23H RHO adRP (TgP23H pigs). We tested RHO1-2 efficacy and durability, on retinal function using full-field electroretinograms and on retinal structure using spectral domain optical coherence tomography and immunohistochemistry. We observe that RHO1-2 treatment: arrests rod photoreceptor degeneration, resurrects rod-driven retinal function that does not exist in untreated TgP23H pigs, restores mislocalized rhodopsin expression and rebuilds rod inner and outer segments (IS/OS). Rod rescue maintains cones. A year after RHO1-2 treatment, we show that TgP23H pigs use rod-driven vision to navigate a maze. Our results demonstrate that genome editing via RHO1-2 meganuclease is a viable treatment to cure human p.P23H RHO adRP. They also suggest that meganuclease-based editors can be effective for other IRDs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Archana Jalligampala, Jacob M Young, Jack Feist, Wei Wang, Francesca Barone, David C Alston, James W Fransen, Gita Jaikumar, Kautuk Kamboj, Caitlin Mooreman, Stephen Nash, Jennifer M Noel, Gobinda Pangeni, Joseph C Prestigiacomo, Bhubanananda Sahu, Caitlin Turner, Henry J Kaplan, Jonathan A Green, Kevin D Wells, Victor V Bartsevich, Jon E Chatterton, Mara Davis, Kathryn S Evans, Janel Lape, Whitney C Lewis, Rebecca van de Beek, Kristi D Viles, Derek Jantz, Ronald G Gregg, Jeff Smith, Maureen A McCall. 2025-09-25. RHO1-2 meganuclease gene editing targets human P23H rhodopsin-induced retinitis pigmentosa to rejuvenate rods and maintain cones.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.25.678625

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article