PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 42100918

Functional characterization of the 9q34.13 locus identifies RAPGEF1 as modulating risk for melanoma and nevi via RAS activation.

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies identified a melanoma- and nevus count-associated locus on chromosome band 9q34.13. Fine-mapping and melanocyte expression data collectively suggest two potential causal genes with opposite association with risk: higher levels of Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 (RAPGEF1) and lower levels of uridine-cytidine kinase 1 (UCK1). Colocalization analyses and conditional TWAS suggest multiple causal cis-regulatory sequence variants in partial linkage disequilibrium (LD) to each other. Melanocyte capture-HiC and CRISPR-inhibition demonstrated regulatory interactions between fine-mapped variants and the RAPGEF1 and UCK1 promoters. Focusing on RAPGEF1, we demonstrate RAPGEF1 expression promotes melanocyte growth and drives malignant transformation of human immortalized melanocytes. Following treatment with human EGF, RAPGEF1 overexpression activated both RAP1 and RAS. Further, we show RAPGEF1 expression is significantly enriched in melanomas lacking strongly activating RAS-MAPK mutations, suggesting that RAPGEF1 may promote oncogenic RAS-MAPK signaling in melanomas. Furthermore, in these tumors, we provide preliminary evidence to support the prognostic relevance of RAPGEF1 expression in patients lacking RAS or BRAF mutations. Together with other recent studies, these data suggest that germline variation influencing RAS activation may play a key role in nevus development and melanoma risk.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rohit Thakur, Mai Xu, Alexandra M Thornock, Joshuah Yon, Samuel Anyaso-Samuel, Martin Lauss, Thomas Rehling, Linh Bui-Raborn, Hayley Sowards, Gerard Duncan, Lea Jessop, Timothy Myers, Raj Chari, Erping Long, Karen Funderburk, Jinhu Yin, Rebecca Hennessey, Emory Hseih, Hannah Levin, Mitchell J Machiela, Tongwu Zhang, Goran Jonsson, D Timothy Bishop, Julia Newton-Bishop, Jeremie Nsengimana, Mark M Iles, Maria Teresa Landi, Matthew H Law, Thorkell Andresson, Jiyeon Choi, Leonard I Zon, Jianxin Shi, Melanoma Meta-Analysis Consortium, Kevin M Brown. 2026-02-08. Functional characterization of the 9q34.13 locus identifies RAPGEF1 as modulating risk for melanoma and nevi via RAS activation.. https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.03.691936

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article