PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 42182255

Distributed Clonal Deletion Prevents Autoimmune Disease Progression.

Abstract

Self-reactive B cells are generated during normal development and can acquire increased pathogenicity through activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID)-mediated diversification following activation. Clonal deletion is thought to eliminate these cells, yet how deletion is distributed across developmental and activation stages to prevent autoimmune disease remains unclear. Here, we show that clonal deletion is enforced through temporally distinct mitochondrial apoptosis (MOMP) checkpoints that differentially regulate autoreactive B cell fate and disease progression. Using conditional Bcl-2 expression to inhibit MOMP either before or after B cell activation, we find that early inhibition permits the survival and maturation of autoreactive B cells after peripheral egress, expanding the pool of cells available for activation. These cells subsequently undergo AID-dependent diversification, producing class-switched IgG autoantibodies with expanded antigen breadth that target a wider range of self-antigens and drive lethal, female-biased autoimmune disease characterized by complement activation and kidney pathology. In contrast, inhibition of MOMP only after activation allows the accumulation of germinal center, switched memory, and plasma cells and promotes autoantibody production, but results in more restricted IgG autoreactivity, limited complement activation and limited tissue damage, and normal survival. Notably, early MOMP inhibition does not expand immature bone marrow B cells, indicating that a major clonal deletion checkpoint operates in the periphery rather than during initial B cell generation. Together, these findings support a Distributed Clonal Deletion Model in which early checkpoints restrict the entry of autoreactive B cells into diversification pathways, while later checkpoints limit the persistence of diversified autoreactive clones, thereby constraining autoimmune disease progression.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anna M Newen, Uzair A Ansari, Mikala J Simpson, Fiona Flynn, Sukriti Sharma, Michael Ivanov, Ishaan Antani, Dylan Pfannenstiel, Baktiar Karim, Laura Bassel, Brian Capaldo, Qingrong Chen, Daoud Meerzaman, Indu Raman, Chengsong Zhu, Cornelius Y Taabazuing, Hamid Kashkar, Christian T Mayer. 2026-05-16. Distributed Clonal Deletion Prevents Autoimmune Disease Progression.. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.12.724341

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article