PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 42282158

Disruption of CTCF binding by germline non-coding variants in CDKN2B suppress CDKN2A expression and predispose to melanoma.

Abstract

Some melanoma-prone families linked to the 9p21 locus, harboring the established susceptibility gene CDKN2A, lack pathogenic protein-coding variants. Using whole-exome and targeted sequencing, we identified three rare single-nucleotide variants in two melanoma-prone families and one sporadic melanoma case. Variants map to a conserved CTCF-bound region within the first intron of CDKN2B that physically interacts with CDKN2A. Analysis of UK Biobank showed significant enrichment of variants in this region in melanoma cases. Variants result in diminished CTCF binding in vitro. CTCF ChIP-seq in fibroblasts from the carriers of the largest family demonstrated loss of CTCF binding, accompanied by weakened promoter interactions and allele-specific reduction of CDKN2A p16 transcript expression from the variant haplotype. CRISPR-based perturbation of this region and editing of the large family variant into melanocytes resulted in reduced expression of p14 and p16 CDKN2A transcripts. These findings suggest that non-coding regulatory variants function as high-penetrance susceptibility alleles in melanoma families by altering CDKN2A function.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jessica L Scales, Jayne A Barbour, Alisa M Goldstein, Rebecca Hennessey, Mai Xu, Abigail J Dennis, Sophie Papiernik, Jung Kim, Sudipto Das, Haocheng Yang, S Chul Kwon, Kornelia Gladysz, Rohit Thakur, Joshuah Yon, Linh Bui-Raborn, Douglas R Stewart, Raj Chari, Paula L Hyland, Jiyeon Choi, Tongwu Zhang, Wen Luo, Kedest Teferi, Thorkell Andresson, Xin Li, Kristine M Jones, Amy Hutchinson, Belynda D Hicks, W Ryan Diver, Adriana Lori, Steven C Moore, Margaret A Tucker, Michael R Sargen, Kevin M Brown, Jason W H Wong, Xiaohong R Yang. 2026-06-02. Disruption of CTCF binding by germline non-coding variants in CDKN2B suppress CDKN2A expression and predispose to melanoma.. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.06.01.26352322

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article