PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 42523510

Associations of Trajectories of Loneliness and Neighborhood Stability with Depression, Alcohol and Substance Use, and Quality of Life among Women Living with HIV.

Abstract

Social relationships are an important social determinant of health. Loneliness, the perceived gap between one's actual and desired relationships, has emerged as an important mechanism through which social relationships impact health. Like other intrapersonal-level factors associated with health, loneliness is influenced by broader social and structural factors, including characteristics of one's neighborhood social environment. Although neighborhood-level protective and risk factors for loneliness and for mental health have been identified, prior studies have often focused solely on self-reported perceptions of the neighborhood environment. Further, few have considered aspects of the neighborhood social environments, such as neighborhood stability (i.e., stability of the community with long or short-term residents), independent of neighborhood socioeconomic conditions. In the current analysis, we explored longitudinal patterns of loneliness in conjunction with neighborhood stability among women with HIV (WWH) enrolled into the MACS/WIHS Combined Cohort Study (MWCCS) from 2014-2019 (N 2019=1,394) to examine whether trajectories of loneliness and neighborhood stability were associated with depressive symptoms, non-prescription substance use, past-year cannabis use, number of alcoholic drinks per week, and several domains of quality of life. Loneliness at baseline (Betas = 0.24 - 0.54) and changes in loneliness over time (Betas = 0.11 - 0.26) were associated with each outcome, except for the association between changes in loneliness over time and drinks per week (Beta=0.13, p = 4.14x10-2), which did not persist after correcting for multiple comparisons. Neighborhood stability at baseline was associated with past year cannabis use (Beta=0.26, p = 1.00x10-2), depressive symptoms (Beta=-0.12, p = 1.54x10-3), and overall self-reported health (Beta=-0.08, p = 2.05x10-2). Changes in neighborhood stability across time were not associated with any outcome. Neighborhood stability moderated the association between changes in loneliness and general health perceptions. Our results demonstrate both overall loneliness and changes in loneliness over time have implications for current mental health in WWH, while changes in neighborhood stability did not.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peter Barr, Andrew Edmonds, Bradley Aouizerat, Mardge Cohen, Judith A Cook, M Reuel Friedman, Sabina Haberlen, Susan Holman, Mirjam-Colette Kempf, Deborah Konkle-Parker, Jennafer L Kwait, David B Hanna, Gayathri Pandey, Michael Plankey, Leah H Rubin, Anna A Rubtsova, Rebecca M Schwartz, Azure B Thompson, Deborah L Jones, Jacquelyn L Meyers, Tracey Wilson. 2026-07-16. Associations of Trajectories of Loneliness and Neighborhood Stability with Depression, Alcohol and Substance Use, and Quality of Life among Women Living with HIV.. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.07.14.26358061

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article