PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42703867

Testing for Genetic Interactions in Complex Disease With Distance Correlation.

Fernando Castro-Prado·Javier Costas·Dominic Edelmann·Wenceslao González-Manteiga·David R Penas
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Understanding epistasis (genetic interaction) may shed some light on the genomic basis of common diseases, including disorders of maximum interest due to their high socioeconomic burden, like schizophrenia. Distance correlation is an association measure that characterizes general statistical independence between random variables, not only the linear one. Here, we propose distance correlation as a novel tool for the detection of epistasis from case-control data of single-nucleotide polymorphisms. On the methodological side, we highlight the derivation of the explicit asymptotic null distribution of the test statistic. We show that this is the only way to obtain enough computational speed for the method to be used in practice, in a scenario where the resampling techniques found in the literature are impractical. Our simulations show satisfactory calibration of significance, as well as comparable or better power than existing methodology. We conclude with the application of our technique to a schizophrenia genetics dataset, obtaining biologically sound insights.

Explore related subjects

Epistasis, GeneticHumansSchizophreniaPolymorphism, Single NucleotideBiometryassociation measuresdistance correlationepistasisgenomics of complex diseasesschizophreniaJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fernando Castro-Prado, Javier Costas, Dominic Edelmann, Wenceslao González-Manteiga, David R Penas. 2026. Testing for Genetic Interactions in Complex Disease With Distance Correlation.. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.70150

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Evaluation of epistasis detection methods for quantitative phenotypes.

MOTIVATION: Epistasis, or genetic interaction, plays a crucial role in shaping complex traits and has been increasingly recognized for its widespread influence in genetic architectures. While epistasis detection has been extensively evaluated in case-control studies, its performance with quantitative phenotypes remains comparatively understudied. RESULTS: We identified and evaluated six epistasis detection methods applicable to quantitative trait analysis: EpiSNP, Matrix Epistasis, MIDESP, PLINK Epistasis, QMDR, and REMMA. Using the EpiGEN simulator, we generated synthetic datasets modeling four classes of pairwise SNP interactions-dominant, multiplicative, recessive, and XOR. We also assessed BOOST and MDR algorithms using discretized (case-control) versions of the same datasets. Performance varied notably by interaction type: REMMA achieved the highest overall detection rate (55%), particularly excelling with dominant interactions (100%). MDR excelled with multiplicative (57%) and XOR (69%) interactions. Meanwhile, EpiSNP attained the best performance for recessive interactions (67%). All methods except BOOST produced F1 scores below 0.05 for most interaction types. We further evaluated the methods using a real-world dataset. When applied to the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development dataset to analyse the externalizing behavior phenotype, both PLINK Epistasis and PLINK BOOST identified SNPs within the DRD2 and DRD4 genes, consistent with previously reported genetic associations. Given the variability in tool performance across interaction types, no single method provides optimal detection across all scenarios. Leveraging multiple detection algorithms may therefore yield more comprehensive insights into epistatic effects in quantitative trait analyses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All relevant code and simulated datasets can be found at github.com/staslist/Epistasis_Review repository.

Epistasis, Genetic↗
PubMed2006

Robustness-epistasis link shapes the fitness landscape of a randomly drifting protein.

The distribution of fitness effects of protein mutations is still unknown. Of particular interest is whether accumulating deleterious mutations interact, and how the resulting epistatic effects shape the protein's fitness landscape. Here we apply a model system in which bacterial fitness correlates with the enzymatic activity of TEM-1 beta-lactamase (antibiotic degradation). Subjecting TEM-1 to random mutational drift and purifying selection (to purge deleterious mutations) produced changes in its fitness landscape indicative of negative epistasis; that is, the combined deleterious effects of mutations were, on average, larger than expected from the multiplication of their individual effects. As observed in computational systems, negative epistasis was tightly associated with higher tolerance to mutations (robustness). Thus, under a low selection pressure, a large fraction of mutations was initially tolerated (high robustness), but as mutations accumulated, their fitness toll increased, resulting in the observed negative epistasis. These findings, supported by FoldX stability computations of the mutational effects, prompt a new model in which the mutational robustness (or neutrality) observed in proteins, and other biological systems, is due primarily to a stability margin, or threshold, that buffers the deleterious physico-chemical effects of mutations on fitness. Threshold robustness is inherently epistatic-once the stability threshold is exhausted, the deleterious effects of mutations become fully pronounced, thereby making proteins far less robust than generally assumed.

Epistasis, Genetic↗
PubMed2006

Statistical epistasis is a generic feature of gene regulatory networks.

Functional dependencies between genes are a defining characteristic of gene networks underlying quantitative traits. However, recent studies show that the proportion of the genetic variation that can be attributed to statistical epistasis varies from almost zero to very high. It is thus of fundamental as well as instrumental importance to better understand whether different functional dependency patterns among polymorphic genes give rise to distinct statistical interaction patterns or not. Here we address this issue by combining a quantitative genetic model approach with genotype-phenotype models capable of translating allelic variation and regulatory principles into phenotypic variation at the level of gene expression. We show that gene regulatory networks with and without feedback motifs can exhibit a wide range of possible statistical genetic architectures with regard to both type of effect explaining phenotypic variance and number of apparent loci underlying the observed phenotypic effect. Although all motifs are capable of harboring significant interactions, positive feedback gives rise to higher amounts and more types of statistical epistasis. The results also suggest that the inclusion of statistical interaction terms in genetic models will increase the chance to detect additional QTL as well as functional dependencies between genetic loci over a broad range of regulatory regimes. This article illustrates how statistical genetic methods can fruitfully be combined with nonlinear systems dynamics to elucidate biological issues beyond reach of each methodology in isolation.

Epistasis, Genetic↗