PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 440801

Appendiceal rupture: a continuing diagnostic problem.

Abstract

The mortality rate for appendicitis in children has remained relatively unchanged since the 1940s, when antibiotics were introduced in the treatment of appendiceal peritonitis. However, since this time the incidence of appendiceal rupture has increased appreciably, presumably owing to a failure of early recognition and treatment. At Columbus Children's Hospital, one half of all patients undergoing appendectomy for ruptured appendix in 1975 had been seen by another physician before admission, but the correct diagnosis had not been made. The history obtained by the primary physician and that given on admission were similar, yet differed from the histories given by patients whose disease had been correctly diagnosed. Findings on in-hospital physical examination of incorrectly diagnosed patients differed from those recorded by the primary physician, but were similar to those of patients whose disease had been correctly diagnosed. Since it is unlikely that the natural history of the disease has changed, the increased incidence of rupture must result either from early misinterpretation of physical findings or from greater delay by parents in responding to the child's illness. Physicians and parents must share the responsibility equally for the increasing incidence of appendiceal rupture in children.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R A Savrin, H W Clatworthy. 1979. Appendiceal rupture: a continuing diagnostic problem.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/440801/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Appendicitis].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Appendicitis

Delayed primary wound closure using skin tapes for advanced appendicitis in children. A prospective, controlled study.

In a 3-year period, 63 consecutive patients with advanced perforated (n=53) and gangrenous (n=10) appendicitis were allocated to undergo either immediate wound closure or delayed primary wound closure after emergency appendectomy. The incidence of wound infection between delayed primary wound closure and immediate wound closure was similar (24.0% and 21.1%, respectively). The duration for complete healing of infected wounds was slightly shorter in the group undergoing delayed primary wound closure (mean +/- SD, 24.3 +/- 9.2 days) than in the group undergoing immediate wound closure (mean +/- SD, 32.6 +/- 16.5 days), but the difference was not significant. However, healing of noninfected wounds was significantly prolonged in the group undergoing delayed primary wound closure (mean +/- SD, 19.3 +/- 10.1 days) compared with the group undergoing immediate wound closure (mean +/- SD, 7.0 +/- 0 days). The latter had been shown to associate with more nonseptic wound complications and therefore required longer rehabilitation. Our study showed that delayed primary closure did not offer additional advantage over immediate closure in the treatment of wounds associated with advanced appendicitis in children.

Appendicitis