PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 45693

Falls from heights.

M I Greenberg
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Falls from heights are most commonly due to accidents in children and suicide, accident, and crime-related incidents in adults. Two types of injury result from falls from heights: injury resulting from direct impact and deceleration-type injury. The injuries resulting from direct impact are mostly fractures. The body position at impact is crucial. The deceleration forces immediately post-impact result primarily in visceral and internal injury, including cranial injury. There is a lack of correlation between os calcis fractures and vertebral fractures. Spinal cord injury is infrequent. Survival figures are higher than usually assumed.

Explore related subjects

Accidental FallsAdultChildEmergenciesHumansMultiple TraumaJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M I Greenberg. 1978. Falls from heights.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0361-1124(78)80192-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

[Falls as a side effect of drugs].

Because of the smaller functional resources, the risk for falls in elderly persons is significantly increased when they take sedative anxiolytics with long half life, antipsychotics, antidepressants and, not so well documented, antihypertensives. Nonpharmacological strategies are, therefore, the treatment of choice for insomnia, depression and agitation in the elderly.

Accidental Falls↗
PubMed1992

A comparison of elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures and a normal elderly population: a case control study.

AIM: To assess the importance of bone density and other risk factors in elderly subjects with hip fractures. METHOD: Thirty-six subjects with femoral neck fracture were compared with 72 community controls in this case control study. Variables compared included: history of falls, previous fracture, body mass index, hand grip strength, blood pressure, medication use, cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, visual acuity, age at menopause, mental status quotient, mobility index and mid thigh circumference. Bone mineral density was measured at the hip (DPA absorptiometer) in the 36 subjects with hip fracture and 36 community controls. RESULTS: Fracture patients had significantly (p < 0.01) reduced bone mineral density at femoral neck (0.64 vs 0.74 g/cm2) and trochanteric regions (0.55 vs 0.66 g/cm2). They also had significantly (p < 0.05) lower body mass index, weaker hand grip strength, smaller mid thigh circumference, reduced mobility and more previous fractures. After controlling for age and sex stepwise logistic regression identified handgrip strength, mobility status and falls in that ranking as risk factors for fracture. Bone mineral density was correlated with mobility status and grip strength. CONCLUSION: Patients with hip fracture have lower bone mineral density than controls. Mobility, grip strength and muscle bulk appear to be important in fracture aetiology and could operate either through bone density or risk of falling.

Accidental Falls↗