PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 4999250

Extended care.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E J Lorenze. 1971. Extended care.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1971.tb03236.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Preconception health care.

Appropriate preconception health care improves pregnancy outcomes. When started at least one month before conception, folic acid supplements can prevent neural tube defects. Targeted genetic screening and counseling should be offered on the basis of age, ethnic background, or family history. Before conception, women should be screened for human immunodeficiency virus and syphilis infection and begin treatment to prevent the transmission of disease to the fetus. Immunizations against hepatitis B, rubella, and varicella should be completed, if needed. Women should be counseled on ways to prevent infection with toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus, and parvovirus B19. Environmental toxins such as cigarette smoke, alcohol, and street drugs, and chemicals such as solvents and pesticides should be avoided. In women with diabetes, it is important to optimize disease control through intensive management before pregnancy. Medications for hypertension, epilepsy, thromboembolism, depression, and anxiety should be reviewed and changed, if necessary, before the patient becomes pregnant. Counseling about exercise, obesity, nutritional deficiencies, and the overuse of vitamins A and D is beneficial. Physicians may also choose to discuss occupational and financial issues related to pregnancy and to screen patients for domestic violence.

Chronic Disease↗

Simplifying outcome measurement: evaluation of instruments for measuring outcome after fusion surgery for chronic low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: A comparative evaluation of outcome instruments and global assessment was performed. OBJECTIVE: To test patient global assessment as a substitute for the use of more comprehensive outcome instruments in treatment trials of chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Treatment outcome can be measured with pain scales and functional instruments. In the absence of a gold standard, the patient him- or herself is the basic reference for outcome, for which the instruments give a more or less exact measurement. Global assessment, which is a retrospective recording, may overestimate improvement as a result of recall or motivational bias. METHODS: In this study, 294 patients treated for chronic low back pain were evaluated with a visual analog scale for back pain, the Oswestry Disability Index, the Million Score and general function score for disease-specific disability, and the Zung Depression Scale for depressive symptoms. The correlation between the pretreatment and posttreatment scores for the outcome instruments (Delta scores) and the global assessment scores was calculated; effect sizes were compared; sensitivity and specificity with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were estimated; and associations of global assessment with pretreatment and posttreatment scores were determined. RESULTS: All the Delta scores showed significant correlations with patient global assessment and with each other. The effect size of global assessment tended to be greater than that of the outcome instruments. The specificity and sensitivity of the disability instruments and pain scale were approximately 75%, whereas they were lower for depression. The associations between global assessment and outcome instrument scores did not produce evidence that global assessment was biased. CONCLUSION: Patient global assessment is a valid and responsive descriptor of overall effect in randomized controlled trials of treatment for chronic low back pain.

Chronic Disease↗