PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 513884

Selecting a suitable appointment system in an outpatient setting.

Abstract

One of the principal causes of waiting time in outpatient departments is the lack of well-designed appointment systems. A conceptual framework is given for dealing with existing appointment systems and to explain their working. The variables that play a role with respect to the appointment system are discussed. All different appointment systems can be compared according to their effect on the patients' waiting time and the physician's idle time, when the systems are expressed in terms of a new variable called "prepunctuality." Prepunctuality means the difference between the time of a patient's arrival at the clinic and the expected time of treatment, and is caused by the patient's own earliness, physician's lateness and the earliness induced by the appointment system chosen. The relationship between prepunctuality and both waiting and idle time was investigated by means of a computer simulation model. In this way, the consequences of using different appointment systems have been clarified, expressed in mean waiting time for the patient and total idle time for the physician. Given certain standards for waiting and idle time, the calculated results can be used to determine an appropriate appointment system and the corresponding waiting and idle time for the range of most common clinic situations. Examples are given to illustrate how these results can be used.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Vissers. 1979. Selecting a suitable appointment system in an outpatient setting.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-197912000-00004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Strategies to reduce HIV risk behavior in HIV primary care clinics: brief provider messages and specialist intervention.

Reducing HIV transmission is a critical goal worldwide, prompting new strategies to slow the spread of the virus. This paper describes the theoretical underpinnings of the Comprehensive Harm Reduction Protocol (CHRP) and the process of its implementation in one large urban HIV clinic and two smaller rural primary care clinics. Patients enrolled in CHRP complete the Risk Diagnostic Questionnaire (RDQ), self-reporting HIV transmission risk behavior at most clinic visits. Clinicians review RDQs to trigger dialogue using motivational interviewing and the stages of health behavior change to reduce high-risk behaviors (drug use, alcohol use, or high-risk sexual behavior). In the ongoing evaluation study, CHRP patients receive two provider-only visits before being randomized to continue with provider brief prevention messages only or to receive additional intensive counseling with a risk-reduction specialist following the provider visit. If outcome data support one or both interventions, CHRP could be a useful model for widespread adoption. Observations from the implementation of this protocol are presented in order to facilitate the adoption of this protocol in interested clinics. Later, results of the evaluation of the implementation of the protocol may have value in developing prevention policy in HIV treatment clinics.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗