PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 5823748

Cervical cerclage.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N S Rangarajan, C H Wright, H Amirikia. 1969. Cervical cerclage.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5823748/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Does the '(Imminent) miscarriage standard of the Dutch College of Family Physicians correspond to the management by gynecologists?].

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the '(Imminent) miscarriage' standard issued by the Dutch College of General Practitioners corresponds to the management by obstetricians. DESIGN: Postal questionnaire. SETTING: Research Centre Primary/Secondary Health Care, Free University Hospital Amsterdam. METHOD: A postal questionnaire was sent in 1994 to all partnerships of obstetricians (n = 122) in the Netherlands about their management in case of an imminent miscarriage. RESULTS: The response rate was 86% (n = 105). Nearly all partnerships (94%) had an agreement about their management in case of an imminent miscarriage, but the individual protocols varied. In case of a miscarriage or an imminent miscarriage 10% and 28% respectively of all partnerships said they would refer the woman to the GP or midwife. Furthermore, 21% of all partnerships said that the GP or midwife could not have an ultrasound scan made themselves, i.e. without referring to the obstetrician. Many respondent knowing the GP standard (64%) did not agree with the guidelines restricting ultrasound scans (39%) or advising expectative management (24%). They thought that an ultrasound scan was essential to diagnosis and that an expectative management would increase the risk of severe blood loss. On the other hand 15% agreed to all the guidelines. CONCLUSION: The management of obstetricians with respect to (imminent) miscarriage is diverse and does not correspond to the guidelines of the '(Imminent) miscarriage' GP standard, notably with respect to the advised expectative management.

Abortion, Threatened

Analysis of maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein and free beta human chorionic gonadotrophin in the first trimester: implications for Down's syndrome screening.

The aim of this study was to determine the maternal population, pregnancy, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotrophin (F beta hCG) parameters in a large series of women attending prenatal clinics before 15 weeks' gestation and to assess the practical problems of population screening for Down's syndrome in the first trimester using these markers. Serum samples were collected from 8600 women attending prenatal clinic booking visits. Maternal serum AFP and F beta hCG medians were calculated for each day of gestation (49-104 days), using both dates and ultrasound estimates of gestation. The effects of maternal weight, twin pregnancies, and threatened abortion on AFP and F beta hCG levels were analysed. The median age of the population was 27.1 years and the median weight 62.1 kg. Twenty-six per cent of samples were collected before 70 days and 50 per cent before 78 days' gestation. Eighty-nine per cent of all samples had gestational estimates by dates, 60 per cent by ultrasound and 52 per cent by both dates and ultrasound. The AFP median was 5 kU/l at 49 days, 5.9 kU/l at 70 days, and 17.9 kU/l at 100 days. The peak median F beta hCG level was 66.4 ng/ml at 64 days, falling to 20.6 ng/ml at 100 days' gestation. Both AFP and F beta hCG levels showed log Gaussian distributions but the standard deviation for AFP was 20 per cent greater than that found in the second trimester. AFP and F beta hCG levels showed an inverse relationship with maternal weight and were increased in twin pregnancies (1.68 and 1.97 multiples of the median, respectively). AFP and F beta hCG can be readily measured in a large screening population in the first trimester. Down's syndrome screening protocols based on these markers could be refined by the use of gestations in individual days but AFP is likely to be a less effective marker and detection rates are likely to be lower than in the second trimester. To realize the potential of first-trimester screening, more women should be encouraged to attend the prenatal clinic in early pregnancy and ultrasound dating should be carried out for all pregnancies at this stage.

Abortion, Threatened