PubMed · 5825893
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
H Schneider. 1964-06-10. [The bedboard].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5825893/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: Most methods used to estimate ICU bed needs rely either on simple formulas that do not consider the actual needs of the population or on simulations that are too specific to be applicable to all hospitals. We sought to develop a universally applicable nonparametric method. DESIGN AND SETTING: For each day, the number of immediate patient transfers to other ICUs because of a full unit and the number of patients treated in the ICU were collected. The number of beds needed was selected according to the minimization of both the mean and the variance of three parameters (accessibility, safety, and efficiency). This method was applied to the ICU of a general hospital. Robustness of the model was assessed using outliers. MAIN RESULTS: During the 5-month study period, 215 ICU stays were collected. The method selected a ten-bed model whereas length-of-stay ratio and case-mix methods selected a twelve- and height-bed models respectively. An unusual increase in admission requests had no consequence on the bed number selected, indicating that the method was robust. None of the parameters were dependent on specific ICU characteristics, establishing that this method is applicable to any type of hospital ward. CONCLUSION: Our model is reliable for determining the number of beds needed in any type of ICU and can be used by all ICU managers. The software is available.
BACKGROUND: An optimal thermal environment is desirable for preterm infants. These infants are usually nursed in incubators, but cot-nursing may provide an alternative. Measures to assist the maintenance of body temperature for smaller infants in open cots include extra clothing/bedding, warming up the nursery and heating the cot mattress. Recently a heated water-filled mattress has been developed to maintain the temperature of a cot-nursed preterm infant. While there may be benefits of nursing preterm infants in open cots, there may be potential risks such as nosocomial infection caused by more handling due to easier access. OBJECTIVES: Among preterm infants allocated to cot-nursing vs incubator care in neonatal period, to assess effects on their temperature control and weight gain. SEARCH STRATEGY: The standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used. This included searches of electronic databases: Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials; Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 4 2001); MEDLINE (1966-2001); and CINAHL (1982-2001), previous reviews including cross references. SELECTION CRITERIA: All trials using random or quasi-random patient allocation in which infants receiving care in standard newborn cots were compared to infants managed in a conventional air heated incubator. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data for the primary outcomes of temperature control and weight gain. Meta-analysis was conducted using a fixed effects model. Results are presented as relative risk (RR) for categorical data and mean difference (MD) and weighted mean differences (WMD) for data measured on a continuous scale. MAIN RESULTS: Nine potential studies were identified of which four, involving 173 babies, were included in this review. When compared to incubator care, cot-nursing resulted in a statistically significantly higher mean body temperature (MD 0.30 degrees C; 95% CI 0.10, 0.50, one trial) and a decrease in proportion of infants not breast feeding at hospital discharge (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.28, 0.94, two trials, 77 infants). No statistically significant difference was shown in weight gain, reported by two trials involving 69 infants. The comparison of cot-nursing using a heated water-filled mattress versus incubator care, which included four trials and a total of 149 infants, produced similar results. Cot-nursing with warming of the nursery resulted in statistically significantly smaller weight gain during week one compared to the incubator group in one trial that involved 49 infants (MD -5.90 g/kg/day; 95% CI -11.13, -0.67) with no significant difference found for weeks two and three. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Due to the small numbers of trials included and infants studied, and the resulting imprecision in the measures of effect for all outcomes, the review does not give a clear indication for the role of cot-nursing for preterm infants. Further assessment of the role of cot nursing for preterm infants using randomised controlled trials is necessary.
Low backrest and supine positions are associated with increased mortality and ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP). Data are not available across ICU settings about the level of backrest position used and its relationship to enteral feeding and hemodynamic status. The purpose of this descriptive study was to document the level of backrest elevation and position and identify factors associated with and predict positioning in a medical, surgical and neuroscience intensive care unit. Data were collected randomly in each unit over a 6-week period, resulting in 506 observations for170 patients. Backrest elevation was determined by electronic bed read-out or bed frame elevation gauge. BP, HR and enteral feeding status were retrieved from the medical record. Results showed that mean backrest elevation was 19.2 degrees and 70% of subjects were supine. No difference in backrest elevation among units was found. Significant correlations between backrest elevation and systolic BP (r=0.15, P=0.006); and backrest and diastolic BP (r=0.13, P=0.02) were found. There was no difference in backrest elevation between patients being fed and not being fed. Differences in backrest elevation for intubated versus nonintubated patients approached significance (P=0.07) with intubated patients at lower backrest elevations. In summary, use of higher backrest elevations (>30 degrees ) is minimal, is not related to feeding and minimally related to hemodynamic status. Strategies to meet published recommendations for backrest elevation (30-45 degrees ) must include repeated feedback about nurse's use of backrest elevation and estimates of elevation.