PubMed · 5956147
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
L N Thornton. 1966. Meat hygiene.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1966.tb07633.x
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
In many fields of toxicology, numbers are used as threshold values, e.g. as "acceptable daily intake values" resulting in maximum permissible concentrations in food or in animal feed by using "safety factors"; maximal admissible concentrations of toxic substances in the air at the workplace; cut-off values in analytical toxicology; limit values for biological specimens in the case of driving under the influence of drugs, guidance values for environmental specimens, etc. The philosophy behind these values must be well understood and they should only be applied to real cases by persons with enough toxicological background. The bad use of these numbers in toxicology can have dramatic consequences. Especially in regulatory toxicology their use should be made with great care. Moreover, tremendous improvements in analytical methodology, e.g. the decreasing of the limits of detection for many potentially toxic substances in recent years, should not end up in an overestimation of risks to humans. To avoid these abuses careful interpretations of analytical findings by qualified toxicologists are of paramount importance. The use and abuse of some of these threshold values will be outlined in several applications from analytical toxicology, risk assessment issues, forensic toxicology in post-mortem cases, as well as from the drugs and driving cases. Generally, if threshold values are considered as guidance values and not as the "absolute truth" in toxicology, they may be very useful in the interpretation of toxicology data.
As a result of routine monitoring data on carrots generated in the 1990s indicating MRL exceedances, further studies showed that residues of organophosphorus compounds in individual roots could vary up to 25 times the levels found in composite samples. Additional work found that this phenomenon also extended to other crops including apples, peaches and celery. Variability (defined as the highest residue level found in any one crop item divided by the level found in a composite sample from the same batch) of up to 34 times mean values was found in one batch of plums. Conventional deterministic methods used in consumer assessments were likely to give gross overestimates of short-term exposure because of the assumptions employed. This led to the development of probabilistic models which made the best use of all available information and was capable of indicating percentages of consumers that could exceed relevant toxicological end points. This indicated that there was unlikely to be serious health effects as a result of ingesting these residues and has subsequently proved to be a useful aid to regulatory decision making.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.